Epstein Secrets

BOP also properly withheld records under Exemption 7(A) that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the prosecutions of Michael Thomas and Tova Noel. The Capone Declarations logically and plausibly explain why these records could reasonably be expected to interfere with Noel, including because t

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA

of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I.

26 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CI

of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I.

26 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CI

BOP also properly withheld records under Exemption 7(A) that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the prosecutions of Michael Thomas and Tova Noel. The Capone Declarations logically and plausibly explain why these records could reasonably be expected to interfere with Noel, including because t

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA

of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I.

26 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CI

BOP also properly withheld records under Exemption 7(A) that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the prosecutions of Michael Thomas and Tova Noel. The Declarations logically and plausibly explain why these records could reasonably be expected to interfere with Noel, including because they "in

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA