Epstein Secrets

ment has submitted a proposed order of nolle prosequi which, once entered, will terminate that proceeding. We have forwarded your correspondence to the Civil Division which will handle any further correspondence regarding these matters." We can also have the point them directly to if that makes sense. From: (US

tinue to get document requests from Epstein's defense team related to his death. How would you like us to handle? Should we refer them to someone at Civ Div? Ignore? There is, as best I can tell, no right to anything given that there is no "proceeding" pending related to the death but, in any event, our

ment has submitted a proposed order of nolle prosequi which, once entered, will terminate that proceeding. We have forwarded your correspondence to the Civil Division which will handle any further correspondence regarding these matters." We can also have the point them directly to jjjjjj, if that makes sense. EFT

tinue to get document requests from Epstein's defense team related to his death. How would you like us to handle? Should we refer them to someone at Civ Div? Ignore? There is, as best I can tell, no right to anything given EFTA00078491 that there is no "proceeding" pending related to the death but, in

ment has submitted a proposed order of nolle prosequi which, once entered, will terminate that proceeding. We have forwarded your correspondence to the Civil Division which will handle any further correspondence regarding these matters." We can also have the point them directly to if that makes sense. From: a (

tinue to get document requests from Epstein's defense team related to his death. How would you like us to handle? Should we refer them to someone at Civ Div? Ignore? There is, as best I can tell, no right to anything given that there is no "proceeding" pending related to the death but, in any event, our