Epstein Secrets

ult of Epstein invoking his 5th Amendment rights. Severino v. Klytie's Developments, Inc., 2008 WL 1782637,

[email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger &

stage. The motion also concentrates on Epstein's risk of loosing this entire civil action as a result of Epstein invoking his 5th Amendment rights. Severino v. Klytie's Developments. Inc., 2008 WL 1782637, '2 (D. Colo)(recognizing that a stay is appropriate under similar circumstances as in the instant

rights and participate in civil discovery in order to defend this civil action. Accordingly, Epstein adopts his arguments set forth in the Reply to Jane Doe's Response In Opposition filed in 08-CIV-80893 (DE 54) and incorporates same herein by reference. EFTA00201284 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 81

titutional rights and allowing for a stay of the civil case until the criminal aspects/investigation of Defendant's companion case are closed). 2. Severino v. Klvtie's Developments, Inc., 27 L 1782637, *2 (D. Colo)(recognizing that a stay is appropriate under simil ces as in the instant case). By: R

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Notice Of Supplemental Authori