Epstein Secrets

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: "Dr. Henry Jarecki" Subject: Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:59:57 +0000 I am troubled, however, by the path the majority takes to reach this result, and thus concur only i

me we should engage in a case-by-case analysis, the touchstone of which is "the 'transferor's intention.' " Id. at 285-86, 80 S.Ct. at 1197 (quoting Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34, 43, 58 S.Ct. 61, 65, 82 L.Ed. 32 (1937)). After reading Duberstein, a reasonable taxpayer would conclude that payment

From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> To: "Dr. Henry Jarecki" Subject: Re: Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:40:16 +0000 your call„ its just funny On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Dr. Henry Jarecki wrote: shou

me we should engage in a case-by-case analysis, the touchstone of which is "the 'transferor's intention.'" Id. at 285-86, 80 S.Ct. at 1197 (quoting Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34, 43, 58 S.Ct. 61, 65, 82 L.Ed. 32 (1937)). After reading Duberstein, a reasonable taxpayer would conclude that payments

From: "Dr. Henry Jarecki" To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:16:51 +0000 should I pass this to wilens? From: Jeffrey E

me we should engage in a case-by-case analysis, the touchstone of which is "the 'transferor's intention.' " Id. at 285-86, 80 S.Ct. at 1197 (quoting Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34, 43, 58 S.Ct. 61, 65, 82 L.Ed. 32 (1937)). After reading Duberstein, a reasonable taxpayer would conclude that payment

To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Dr. Henry Jarecki Sent Sat 9/12/2009 7:16:51 PM Subject RE: should I pass this to wilens? From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, Se

e we should engage in a case-by-case analysis, the touchstone of which is "the 'transferor's intention.' " Id. at 285-86, 80 S.Ct. at 1197 (quoting Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34, 43, 58 S.Ct. 61, 65, 82 L.Ed. 32 (1937)). After reading Duberstein, a reasonable taxpayer would conclude that payments