Epstein Secrets

.5); see also Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (I Ith Cir. 1985) (citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 7

Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2009 Page 23 of 24 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BU

civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (I Ith Cir. 1985), citing Lefkowitz v. Turley. 414 U.S. 70, 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded "liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended t

on this~ day of , 2009. By:.IZ'::1-:::--:i'-'~:::::::C':":"".:-:::::--::-:: RO E . CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/8

9 Omnibus Order,2 "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (I Ith Cir. 1992) .... Courts have long held that '[w]hile the standard of relevancy [in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party

Y EPSTEIN, respectfully requests the Court deny Jane Doe's Motion (DE #486) and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. By: s/Michael J. Pike ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar #224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true

l. 3, §10, cl. 1. U.S. v. Seigel, 153 F.3d 1256 (I Ith Cir. 1998); U.S. v. Edwards, 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998

SQ. Florida Bar No. 224 I 62 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BU