5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
lying a low-pass anti-aliasing filter with a cutoff frequency of 40 Hz and then downsampling by a factor of 10. A zero-phase, fourth-order, low-pass Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 1 Hz was then applied to the kinematic and EEG data. The cutoff frequency was determined experimentally with infl
s of sensor contributions were produced by the topoplot function of EEGLAB, an open-source MATLAB toolbox for electrophysiological data processing (Delorme and Makeig, 2004; http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/), that performs biharmonic spline interpolation of the sensor values before plotting them (Sandwell,
al. 2003). Signals from each EEG electrode were decimated by a 149 factor of 5 (to 100 liz), then filtered with a zero-phase, 3rd order, band-pass Butterworth filter 150 (0.1 — 2 Hz) and normalized by subtracting their mean and dividing by their standard deviation 151 (Bradbeny et al. 2010). Kinematic d
773 774 Nielsen JB. How we walk: central control of muscle activity during human walking 775 Neuroscientist 9: 195-204, 2003 776 777 Onton J, Delorme A, Makeig S. Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory 778 Neurolmage 27: 341-356, 2005 779 780 Pfurtscheller G, Brunner C, Schlogl, Lo
mployed in this study has been previously described (Bradberry et a! 2010) so will only briefly be described here. First, a fourth-order, low-pass Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of I Hz was applied to the kinematic and EEG data. Very low frequencies have previously been shown to possess kinema
-110-0 ms in increments of 10 ms) of scalp maps. These spatial renderings of sensor contributions were produced by the topoplot function of EEGLAB (Delorme and Makcig 2004), an open-source MATLAB toolbox for electrophysiological data processing that performs bihannonic spline interpolation (Sandwell 1
The best decoding results were obtained when both the MEG and kinematic data were subsequently filtered with a zero-phase. fourth-order, low-pass Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 15 Hz. The data for each phase of the task were pre-processed separately. Decoding model In the subsequent analy
eras-Vidal. J.L Kerick. S.E.. 2004. Independent component analysis of dynamic brain responses during visuornotor adaptation. Neuroimage 21.936-945. Delorme. A.. Matteis, 5.. 2004. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single. trial EEC dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neuro
t al. 2003). Signals from each EEG electrode were decimated by a 149 factor of 5 (to 100 Hz), then filtered with a zero-phase, 3rd order, band-pass Butterworth filter 150 (0.1 - 2 Hz) and normalized by subtracting their mean and dividing by their standard deviation 151 (Bradberry et al. 2010). Kinematic
773 774 Nielsen JB. How we walk: central control of muscle activity during human walking 775 Neuroscientist 9: 195-204, 2003 776 777 Onton J, Delorme A, Makeig S. Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory 778 Neurolmage 27: 341-356, 2005 779 780 Pfurtscheller G, Brunner C, Schlogl, Lo
Entities connected to both Butterworth and Delorme

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONDoug Band
PERSON
Signal
ORGANIZATIONEEGLAB
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
James Baker
PERSONSchulze-Bonhage
ORGANIZATION
Michael Cohen
PERSONSEASAT
ORGANIZATIONOptotrak
LOCATION
J. Neurosci
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSONRong F
PERSONLachaux J P
PERSONNeurosci
ORGANIZATIONThe Institutional Review Board
ORGANIZATION
Robert Mueller
PERSONNorthern Digital
ORGANIZATIONJose Luis Contreras-Vidal
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON