Epstein Secrets

xists, and the information finds its light of truth in a court. Until then, the documents are under seal and the "no dissemination" ruling by Judge Hafele has been fully complied with by Epstein and his counsel. The Record Truth is that the Extraordinary Documents Remain Under Seal and No Partial Rel

ustralian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter- Defendant Jeffrey Epstein VIA U.S. MAIL The Honorable Donald W. Hafele Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10.1216 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 11 EFTA00805468 LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Bea

hat's not the issue. You've done your job." (App. D-2, 59:24.) Even though this Court's stay order did not occur for an entire 24 hours after Judge Hafele's oral ruling on March 8, 2018, Epstein and his counsel took into account that the attendance by the trial judge and counsel at the Palm Beach Count

f custody and ethical handling of the documents-turned-exhibits. (App. B and App. C.) "I'm not finding fault with anything you [Scott Link] or Miss Rockenbach or Miss Campbell did. That's not the issue. You've done your job." (App. D-2, 59:24.) Even though this Court's stay order did not occur for an enti

y" identified by Epstein's current counsel. Attempting to discern the origin of the emails (clearly legally and properly obtained by Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach), the trial judge ultimately concluded that he would deal after trial, if at all, with the how predecessor counsel, Fowler White, obtained the docu

stein never even knew Fowler White had the disc until we found it." Counsel for three victims — identified as L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe — asked Judge Hafele to order Fowler White to explain its handling of the confidential documents, but he said he lacked the authority to do so since the firm had withdr

d the materials from Fowler White's files. According to the motion, during a March 8 hearing on the privileged communications, State Circuit Judge Donald W. Hafele said, "The critical question, though, is why did Fowler White have these documents, why were they continued to be held, and was it in violation eith

s & Lehrman PL is represented by Bradley J. Edwards and Brittany N. Henderson of Edwards Pottinger LLC. Epstein is represented by Scott J. Link and Kara Rockenbach of Link & Rockenback PA and Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss PA. Edwards is represented by Jack Scarola and David P. Vitale of Se

er. Ultimately, following a summary judgment motion by Edwards, Epstein dropped his lawsuit; currently pending before Judge Crow's successor, Judge Hafele, is a follow-on action, Edwards v. Epstein, for malicious prosecution by Epstein in filing his lawsuit in the first place. 6 EFTA00799319 Case 0

client. And I can say legal counsel, Mr. Goldberger. So that's it." Hearing Trans. 64:14-19. 30. During the hearing, counsel for Epstein (Link and Rockenbach) also revealed that Fowler White was disclaiming any memory of the circumstances surrounding the creation and retention of the disc: "We have reach

cause, for representing then-minor girls sexually abused by Epstein, including L.M. 21. On March 2, 2018, Epstein, through counsel Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach, Epstein filed Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Filing of Redacted Appendix in Support of Response in Opposition to Defendan

he emergency stay of proceedings, it was Epstein's counsel who worked with opposing counsel over the weekend and appeared at 8:30 a.m. before Judge Hafele in order to enter an Agreed Order nunc pro tunc so the clerk could seal the records temporarily. (App. E.) To be clear, Epstein wants a full in ca

assell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] The Honorable Donald W. Hafele Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10.1216 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Intervenors E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe 12

exhibits to the trial 6 EFTA00793722 court's attention: "So I again want to make clear that I'm finding absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss Campbell or anyone else from the Link and Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did. . ." (App. D-2, 61:15-18.) Indisputably, it was Epstein

uage contained therein 06/05/18 TLC Communications with opposing counsel on proposed order re J. Epstein's deposition; finalize package to Judge Hafele and submit same; follow up on trial setting issues; communications with opposing counsel re same 06/05/18 SJL Review D. Indyke's edits to Respons

e Amount Currency Effecti Date ve Confirmation Number Approval Status Jeffrey Epstein - NOW -'9691 JEE to Link and Rockonbach PA Link and Rockenbach, PA. 122,434.53 USD 07/18/2918 2541126401 1 of 1 received EFTA00799164 From: Darren Indyke Subject: Fwd: Link a Rockenbach Revised June Bill

tiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein's Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhibit List, et al. The above-styled cause came on for hearing before the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, Presiding Judge, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, on the 2nd day of November, 2018. Palm Beach

ip. We did not take exhibits and documents we intended to use and had it in our files, sit back and wait. This Court knows that's not the way Ms. Rockenbach and I practice, it's not the way we did it here. And we made sure that we produced, on a rolling basis, the documents, so as not to have them hit