Epstein Secrets

Page 6 of 22 Page6 Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sue Sponte (DE 23)(the "Notice of Withdrawal"). Obviously, by filing the Notice of Withdrawal, Plaintiff recognized that her attempts to prevent meaningful di

der; and d. for such other and further relief as this court dee just and proper. By:---+------ ROBERT . CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida B No. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of th

in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sue Sponte (DE 23)(the "Notice of Withdrawal"). Subsequent thereto, Defendant sought records by way of subpoena. However, on June 5, 2009, Plaintiff then fil

this fl day of µt'f3f- , 2009 By:_.:::::..-f--:,,L..::::::::::_---=:::=-::-- ROBER . CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/8

in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sue Sponte (DE 23)(the "Notice of Withdrawal"). Defendant's Motion to Identify can be found at docket entry #67 in the individual C.M.A. matter. Obviously, b

the trial date; and d. for such other and further relief as this cou By: __ ....../--'------ ROBERT D CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar. No. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of th

poenas (but not file them in Court or, if required, in a redacted form); and c. That, on an alternative basis, this court dismiss this action Sua Sponte until such time as JANE DOE identifies herself in the style of this matter. Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D.at 163. WHEREFORE, Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein, r

llsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein By: ~~~~~:.--ii:i'"""ccr- R D. CRI N, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/8

The Style Of This Case And Motion To Identify Jane Doe In Third-Party Subpoenas For Purposes Of Discovery, Or Alternatively, Motion To Dismiss Sue Sponte, With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law (the "Motion to Identify"). In support, Mr. Epstein states as follows: I. Introduction 1. Prior to these ca

ing Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this £ day of !f,l,L( , 2009 u . CRITTON, JR., ESQ. oridaBarNo. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/8