Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
financial analyst in investment banking at CIBC Oppenheimer, and its predecessor, Oppenheimer & Co, Inc. Jos
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
financial analyst in investment banking at CIBC Oppenheimer, and its predecessor, Oppenheimer & Co, Inc. Jos
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
financial analyst in investment banking at CIBC Oppenheimer, and its predecessor, Oppenheimer & Co, Inc. Jos
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
financial analyst in investment banking at CIBC Oppenheimer, and its predecessor, Oppenheimer & Co, Inc. Jos
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
financial analyst in investment banking at CIBC Oppenheimer, and its predecessor, Oppenheimer & Co, Inc. Jos
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (148)
Entities connected to both J. Robert Oppenheimer and Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund
Credit Suisse
ORGANIZATION148 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Julie K. Brown
PERSON138 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Liechtenstein
LOCATION107 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Glendower
LOCATION83 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Deutsche Bank
ORGANIZATION76 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
United States
LOCATION60 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Prince Charles
PERSON58 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Milan
LOCATION55 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Tufts University
ORGANIZATION49 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
CS
Charles Smith
PERSON47 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
KW
Katherine Weaver
PERSON46 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
CIBC Oppenheimer
ORGANIZATION46 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
FR
Francesco
PERSON46 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
DE
Deirdre
PERSON45 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Joshua
PERSON45 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Glendower Capital
ORGANIZATION45 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
General Electric
ORGANIZATION45 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Paul Capital
ORGANIZATION42 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
Gallo & Co.
ORGANIZATION34 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge
AC
Aldrich Chan
PERSON33 w/ J.·5 w/ Cambridge