3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
reviewing court might have decided the issue differently is not sufficient to overturn a decision when there are two permissible views of the issue. Georgia State Conference of Branches of NAACP v. Georgia, 775 F.2d 1403, 1416 (11th Cir. 1985). After careful review of the Magistrate’s Order, Plaintiffs’ Appeal, and Defendant’s Response, the C
092 ____________________________________/ ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHNSON’S DISCOVERY ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-8's Appeal and Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Discovery Order Entered September 10, 2009. (DE 327). Defendant filed a response in oppositi
reviewing court might have decided the issue differently is not sufficient to overturn a decision when there are two permissible views of the issue. Georgia State Conference of Branches of NAACP v. Georgia, 775 F.2d 1403, 1416 (11th Cir. 1985). After careful review of the Magistrate’s Orders, Defendant’s appeal, the response, and the reply, t
FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
eviewing court might have decided the issue differently is not sufficient to overturn a decision when there are two permissible views of the issue. Georgia State Conference of Branches of NAACP v. Georgia, 775 F.2d 1403, 1416 (11th Cir. 1985). After careful review of the Magistrate's Orders, Defendant's appeal, the response, and the reply
OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend
Entities connected to both Georgia State Conference of Branches of NAACP and Jane Doe