3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
th is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protect
________ / Defendant's Response In Opposition to Jane Doe 2-8s Motion to Compel Net Worth Discovery, With
1973) (the person complying with the subpoena "implicitly testifies that the evidence he brings forth is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protected from producing his documents in response to a Subpoena duces tecum, for his production of them i
... travels in foreign commerce". Thus, facially, an essential proof of any allegation of 18 U.S.C. 2422(b) - the statutory precondition alleged by Jane Doe 2 for a 2255 civil damage recovery - includes telephone, cellular phone, e-mail records or other "communications" as a facility of interstate comme
th is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protect
allegations. The Plaintiffs attorney represents Jane Doe Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, in civil actions again
Entities connected to both Defore and Jane Doe

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
Salt Lake City
LOCATIONScott Rothstein
PERSONRobert C. Josefsberg
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSONKatherine W. Ezell
PERSONRichard Horace Willits
PERSONJack Patrick Hill
PERSONIsidro Manuel Garcia
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATION
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION