3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 4
Mentions
rtainly, these responses were not intended to "gild the lily" as Plaintiff contends nor are they misleading. Despite what the interrogatory sought, Plaintff chose to limit same in her Reply to only what the Federal Government gave Epstein, and that is exactly how the Magistrate interpreted same. The res
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 545 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2010 Page 4 of 37 Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 4 (a) Jane Doe Plaintiff, Jane Doe's Motion to Compel is filed at DE (194). Defendant's Response in Opposition is filed at DE (339), and the arguments set forth therein are incorporated
e, if this court rules that any of the information requested herein should be produced (e.g., Requests Numbers 12 and 13 (tax returns and passport — Jane Doe) and Request Number 1 (tax returns-Jane Doe 2-8)), it shall only do so after an in camera hearing allowing the documents to be reviewed and placed o
If in fact there has been inappropriate and/or illegal conduct associated with the prosecution of this case by RRA or any of its attorneys or by the Plaintff herself, which might result in sanctions, dismissal or other remedy, Defendant Epstein will be severely prejudiced. WHEREFORE, Defendant Epstein r
REPLY TO ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER'S P.A.'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE (DE 4051 (AS TO JANE DOE v. EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893) Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Reply to Rot
rtainly, these responses were not intended to "gild the lily" as Plaintiff contends nor are they misleading. Despite what the interrogatory sought, Plaintff chose to limit same in her Reply to only what the Federal Government gave Epstein, and that is exactly how the Magistrate interpreted same. The re
ocket entries. Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 545 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2010 Page 4 of 37 Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 4 (a) Jane Doe Plaintiff, Jane Doe's Motion to Compel is filed at DE (194). Defendant's Response in Opposition is filed at DE (339), and the arguments set forth t
Entities connected to both Plaintff and Jane Doe

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
Salt Lake City
LOCATIONScott Rothstein
PERSONRobert C. Josefsberg
PERSONKatherine W. Ezell
PERSONIsidro Manuel Garcia
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONSpencer Kuvin
PERSON
Podhurst Orseck
ORGANIZATION
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON
Bradley Cooper
PERSON