Epstein Secrets

fe or her daughter making a video. See Exhibit 4, deposition excerpt of Jane Doe No. 4’s mother. 7. Defendant now wants to take the deposition of Rocky Orezzoli, Jane Doe No. 4’s college soccer coach, and Bill Brown, Doe No. 4’s soccer coach in middle and high school. The past conduct of Epstein’s counsel

was cheating on him?” (Exh. 3, p. 132); Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 534 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2010 Page 3 of 8 ----- 4 * “[Jane Doe No. 4] testified also in deposition that she had been—there had been a videotape made of her and another female in various positions that some of he

; Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Compel and/or Identify Plaintiffs in the Style of this Case (D.E. 144); Plaintiffs Jane Does’ 2-7 Motion for Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 223); Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-8’s Motion for Protective Order as to Jef

and states as follows: 1. Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 4’s Motion for Protective Order (“Motion”) is now moot, in part, with regard to the deposition of Rocky Orezzoli, as Mr. Orezzoli was deposed by Defendant Epstein’s counsel on April 30, 2010, while the Motion was pending. However, the Motion remains ripe with

0381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092, ____________________________________/ PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 4’S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 4’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (DE 534) Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 4, by and thr

discovery and thus preventing Epstein from deposing third parties, including two individuals that were Jane Doe 4's soccer coaches for years (i.e., Rocky Orezzoli and Bill Brown). Limiting such discovery would undoubtedly result in reversible error. Plaintiff claims Epstein is harassing her by way of seeking

fected them emotionally and psychologically. See ~-, Exhibit "D", Affidavit of Richard C.W. Hall, outlining the psychological issues experienced by Jane Doe 4 as a result of incidents in her life prior to Epstein, which cannot be discounted. As such, Plaintiffs should not, once again, be able to "handpic