Epstein Secrets

loped from Epstein's sexual abuse, confidential materials were at issue before this Court. In contravention of this Court's order, Epstein's counsel Fowler White retained a copy of confidential materials related to the Victims. Id. at 5-6. And ultimately, through machinations yet to be fully explained, it ap

ry, Epstein did not file any answer or response, even though Epstein had previously filed a detailed Response in Opposition to Bradley Edwards' and Farmer Jaffe's Summaries of Damages for violation of the same order from this Court. See DE 6394. Accordingly, unlike the damages sought by Mr. Edwards which Epste

d organizing the documents. That could be performed without reading them, but Farmer Jaffe still expressed concern about Epstein and his counsel at Fowler White possibly misappropriating them. The bankruptcy court granted the copying request in the Nov. 30, 2010, order at issue here, and Included an enforce

granted motions from former Farmer Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented nine of Epstein's victims, and three of those victims to join Farmer Jaffe's sanctions bid. He also ordered them to file a summary of their alleged damages with the court. The judge also decided during the hearing to order E

Bradley J. Edwards, through counsel, hereby files this Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief,

OSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Bradley J. Edwards, through counsel, hereby files this Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Cost