4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
record again. The Electronics Technician told the OIG that he informed a Company 1 Technician that he had to obtain the drives from MCC New York's Computer Services Manager. The Electronics Technician further stated that he left the institution at the end of his shift and did not obtain the hard drives and did n
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.
record again. The Electronics Technician told the OIG that he informed a Company 1 Technician that he had to obtain the drives from MCC New York's Computer Services Manager. The Electronics Technician further stated that he left the institution at the end of his shift and did not obtain the hard drives and did n
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.
record again. The Electronics Technician told the OIG that he informed a Company 1 Technician that he had to obtain the drives from MCC New York’s Computer Services Manager. The Electronics Technician further stated that he left the institution at the end of his shift and did not obtain the hard drives and did
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency’s decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U
record again. The Electronics Technician told the OIG that he informed a Company 1 Technician that he had to obtain the drives from MCC New York's Computer Services Manager. The Electronics Technician further stated that he left the institution at the end of his shift and did not obtain the hard drives and did n
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.
Entities connected to both Computer Services and The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONSpecial Housing Unit
ORGANIZATION
South
LOCATIONCentral Office
ORGANIZATIONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Metropolitan Correctional Center
ORGANIZATIONAction Review
ORGANIZATIONNortheast Regional
LOCATION
the United States Government
ORGANIZATIONFBI
ORGANIZATIONAssociate Wardens
PERSONSHU meetings
ORGANIZATIONNortheast Regional Office
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATIONthe Day
ORGANIZATIONMCC New York Staff
ORGANIZATION
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Mark Epstein
PERSONthe Day Watch Activities Lieutenant
ORGANIZATION