Epstein Secrets

tion is the BOP Command Center and Backup Command Center are both NICE-centric platforms from what I understand. On the other hand, yes, someone in Central Office seems to have gotten the agency to jump head first in to the SIGNET/NICE pool. The main reason that I can think of as to why is the migration to IPv

is the contract with SIGNET. We have a BOP-wide maintenance contract with them for our DVR/NVR systems. Currently, that contract is set up for NICE, Pelco and Vicon. With only 1 manufacturer on both the approved hardware list and maintenance contract, we're in a bit of a pickle. I do not know when the

as have to be approved on a (Indiscernible *00:32:38) list. And the problem was the cameras that I had requested, BOP went and changed, whoever in Central Office - the original proposal was for access cameras and the problem was these cameras were not going to work on the NiceVision. When you added them to

, but we have to order - the next year, those are the cameras we installed. I installed a few of these cameras and I had issues, so we had to go to Pelco from the order from the next year. MR. : So, no matter what, you had issues, but do you recall telling Justin - or you said, right now, that you

tion is the BOP Command Center and Backup Command Center are both NICE-centric platforms from what I understand. On the other hand, yes, someone in Central Office seems to have gotten the agency to jump head first in to the SIGNET/NICE pool. The main reason that I can think of as to why is the migration to IPv

is the contract with SIGNET. We have a BOP-wide maintenance contract with them for our DVR/NVR systems. Currently, that contract is set up for NICE, Pelco and Vicon. With only 1 manufacturer on both the approved hardware list and maintenance contract, we're in a bit of a pickle. I do not know when the

tion is the BOP Command Center and Backup Command Center are both NICE-centric platforms from what I understand. On the other hand, yes, someone in Central Office seems to have gotten the agency to jump head first in to the SIGNET/NICE pool. The main reason that 1 can think of as to why is the migration to IPv

is the contract with SIGNET. We have a BOP-wide maintenance contract with them for our DVR/NVR systems. Currently, that contract is set up for NICE, Pelco and Vicon. With only 1 manufacturer on both the approved hardware list and maintenance contract, we're in a bit of a pickle. I do not know when the

tion is the BOP Command Center and Backup Command Center are both NICE-centric platforms from what I understand. On the other hand, yes, someone in Central Office seems to have gotten the agency to jump head first in to the SIGNET/NICE pool. The main reason that I can think of as to why is the migration to IPv

is the contract with SIGNET. We have a BOP-wide maintenance contract with them for our DVR/NVR systems. Currently, that contract is set up for NICE, Pelco and Vicon. With only 1 manufacturer on both the approved hardware list and maintenance contract, we're in a bit of a pickle. I do not know when the

tion is the BOP Command Center and Backup Command Center are both NICE-centric platforms from what I understand. On the other hand, yes, someone in Central Office seems to have gotten the agency to jump head first in to the SIGNET/NICE pool. The main reason that I can think of as to why is the migration to 1Pv

is the contract with SIGNET. We have a BOP-wide maintenance contract with them for our DVR/NVR systems. Currently, that contract is set up for NICE, Pelco and Vicon. With only 1 manufacturer on both the approved hardware list and maintenance contract, we're in a bit of a pickle. I do not know when the