Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
ildren, not the purchasers or the johns." Fierro v. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2012) (quoting United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11-CR-40016, 2012 WL 13704, at *4 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012)) (emphasis added). In Fierro, the district court found § 1591 inapplicable to consumer
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
ildren, not the purchasers or the johns." Fierro v. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2012) (quoting United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11-CR-40016, 2012 WL 13704, at *4 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012)) (emphasis added). In Fierro, the district court found § 1591 inapplicable to consumer
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
ildren, not the purchasers or the johns." Fierro v. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2012) (quoting United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11-CR-40016, 2012 WL 13704, at *4 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012)) (emphasis added). In Fierro, the district court found § 1591 inapplicable to consumer
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
ildren, not the purchasers or the johns." Fierro v. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2012) (quoting United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11-CR-40016, 2012 WL 13704, at *4 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012)) (emphasis added). In Fierro, the district court found § 1591 inapplicable to consumer
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (133)
Entities connected to both Jessup and Bonestroo
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Jessup·18 w/ Bonestroo
United States
LOCATION13 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
the Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Jessup·16 w/ Bonestroo
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Jessup·15 w/ Bonestroo
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·18 w/ Bonestroo
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
George Mitchell
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
Pretrial Services
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
ST
Stroh
PERSON8 w/ Jessup·13 w/ Bonestroo
MO
Morrison
PERSON8 w/ Jessup·13 w/ Bonestroo
Reid Weingarten
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
New York
LOCATION6 w/ Jessup·15 w/ Bonestroo
Richard M. Berman
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
Harry Reid
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
ZA
Zarrab
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·17 w/ Bonestroo
BO
Boustani
PERSON8 w/ Jessup·13 w/ Bonestroo
FT
Fierro v. Taylor
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·16 w/ Bonestroo
Contreras
PERSON9 w/ Jessup·10 w/ Bonestroo