Epstein Secrets

This Court had personal jurisdiction over Epstein at the time of his death because the tortious acts giving rise to Plaintiff's claims took place in New York State. 24. This Court has personal jurisdiction over because the tortious acts and omissions giving rise to Plaintiff's claims took place in New York S

DYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and Defendants. x Plaintiff Mary Doe', by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Beginning when Plaintiff Mary Doe was sixteen years

e of his death. 17. This Court had both specific and general personal jurisdiction over Epstein at the time of his death. 18. Epstein resided in New York State a substantial portion of the time during the time period at issue in this lawsuit, and through the time of his death. 3 EFTA00084146 Case 1:19-c

TORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION EFTA00084144 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Fil

DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. x Plaintiff by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. When Plaintiff was just seventeen years old, living

e of his death. 17. This Court had both specific and general personal jurisdiction over Epstein at the time of his death. 18. Epstein resided in New York State a substantial portion of the time during the time period at issue in this lawsuit, and through the time of his death. 3 EFTA00025111 --- PAGE BR