Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
except in the most extraordinary circumstances." Forde, 740 F.Supp.2d at 412 (citing Gaudin, 515 U.S. at 522-23). As the Supreme Court explained in Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997), "there is no doubt that materiality is an element of perjury under § 1623," and its precedent "therefore dict
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
except in the most extraordinary circumstances." Forde, 740 F.Supp.2d at 412 (citing Gaudin, 515 U.S. at 522-23). As the Supreme Court explained in Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997), "there is no doubt that materiality is an element of perjury under § 1623," and its precedent "therefore dict
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
except in the most extraordinary circumstances." Forde, 740 F.Supp.2d at 412 (citing Gaudin, 515 U.S. at 522-23). As the Supreme Court explained in Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997), "there is no doubt that materiality is an element of perjury under § 1623," and its precedent "therefore dict
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
except in the most extraordinary circumstances." Forde, 740 F.Supp.2d at 412 (citing Gaudin, 515 U.S. at 522-23). As the Supreme Court explained in Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997), "there is no doubt that materiality is an element of perjury under § 1623," and its precedent "therefore dict
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Scarlett Johansson and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,425 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON828 w/ Scarlett·3 w/ N.Y.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON628 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION525 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON388 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION340 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON317 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON310 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON266 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON231 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION211 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Stephen Hawking
PERSON210 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON190 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
George Mitchell
PERSON188 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Colorado
LOCATION171 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Bill Richardson
PERSON151 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Minnesota
LOCATION146 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Michigan
LOCATION143 w/ Scarlett·3 w/ N.Y.
Chris Tucker
PERSON140 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.
Oregon
LOCATION124 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ N.Y.