Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
there was no cause to consider whether the same "community" was relevant to separate challenges to the grand and petit juries. See United States v. Johnson, 21 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-35 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); United States v. Kenny, 883 F. Supp. 869, 874-75 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). As such, neither case supports the pr
sfy the second prong of the Duren test. 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995). The unique facts of Jackman make it readily distinguishable. The jury clerk in Jaclanan relied on a qualified jury wheel that was mostly drawn from a master jury wheel that completely excluded potential jurors from two cities in the Di
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
there was no cause to consider whether the same "community" was relevant to separate challenges to the grand and petit juries. See United States v. Johnson, 21 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-35 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); United States v. Kenny, 883 F. Supp. 869, 874-75 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). As such, neither case supports the pr
sfy the second prong of the Duren test. 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995). The unique facts of Jackman make it readily distinguishable. The jury clerk in Jaclanan relied on a qualified jury wheel that was mostly drawn from a master jury wheel that completely excluded potential jurors from two cities in the Di
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
there was no cause to consider whether the same "community" was relevant to separate challenges to the grand and petit juries. See United States v. Johnson, 21 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-35 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); United States v. Kenny, 883 F. Supp. 869, 874-75 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). As such, neither case supports the pr
sfy the second prong of the Duren test. 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995). The unique facts of Jackman make it readily distinguishable. The jury clerk in Jaclanan relied on a qualified jury wheel that was mostly drawn from a master jury wheel that completely excluded potential jurors from two cities in the Di
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
there was no cause to consider whether the same "community" was relevant to separate challenges to the grand and petit juries. See United States v. Johnson, 21 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-35 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); United States v. Kenny, 883 F. Supp. 869, 874-75 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). As such, neither case supports the pr
sfy the second prong of the Duren test. 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995). The unique facts of Jackman make it readily distinguishable. The jury clerk in Jaclanan relied on a qualified jury wheel that was mostly drawn from a master jury wheel that completely excluded potential jurors from two cities in the Di
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (119)
Entities connected to both Scarlett Johansson and Jaclanan
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,425 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
United States
LOCATION525 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
LB
Leon Black
PERSON446 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON310 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON234 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
John F. Kennedy
PERSON164 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
Bill Richardson
PERSON151 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION123 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
CO
Collins
PERSON106 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
Barneys New York
ORGANIZATION94 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON87 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
Louisiana
LOCATION87 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
TH
Thompson
PERSON86 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
SU
Sullivan
PERSON80 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
WA
Walker
PERSON76 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
PE
Perez
PERSON70 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
Richmond
LOCATION57 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
Howell
PERSON52 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
WA
Walsh
PERSON52 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan
New York State
LOCATION51 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Jaclanan