Epstein Secrets

22(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 78 EFTA00224212 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION di, CHARGE'S ED. Wis. U.S. I Davidson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95757 (E.D. Wis. 2006); U.S. I Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429 (ED. Wis. 2007) Internet Defendant pretending to be a

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. I Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1379982 (11th Cir. 2007) Slip Copy Not for Publication Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr

for meeting Sting 75 EFTA01729559 , .., ... • COURT .' .. ._.:. . . CASES . FACILITY .• FACTS/COMMUNIC4TIQN ;,C . OE E.D. Wis. U.S. v. Davidson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95757 (ED. Wis. 2006) Internet No information available but appears to showed up for meeting arranged through Internet.

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, • Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(6); 2252A(a)(1) &

,:. • .% '-• r "FACIWIT-_,', ..-- , •-;:c-...,,, g.3.O., ‘.0ACTS/a01\1141trICATip$ .; - pw.:.4. "..:etkAh !,-..:4 !,CEIAlicE E.D. Wis. U.S. v. Davidson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95757 (E.D. Wis. 2006) Internet No information available but appears to showed up for meeting arranged through Internet.

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (

338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002). 2422(b); 2423 No Information 80 EFTA00226316 COURT CASES FACILITY :.FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE E.D. Wis. U.S. I Davidson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95757 E.D. ( Wis. 2006); U.S. I Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429 (E.D. Wis. 2007) Internet Defendant pretending to b

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S.'. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (