3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
y I send to print the attached revised Remainder A plan drawings that John submitted to you after addressing your feedback comments? Respectfully, Daphne On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:47 AM, John P. Woods Jeffrey, wrote: Attached are the revised drawings for Parcel Remainder A. I have removed the refer
cel Remainder A. I have removed the reference to the tennis court and the flagpole. The flagpole on "holy shit" point is part of the application for Parcel Remainder C-1. The flagpole on or near to Remainder A is a part of CZM Permit No. CZT-05-17L. Therefore it doesn't need to be shown and may actually create confu
e changes today for your review so the drawings can go to print with your approval by tomorrow, so they are ready for you on Monday. Respectfully, Daphne On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Daphne Wallace < > wrote: Greetings Sir, May I send to print the attached revised Remainder A plan drawings that
cel Remainder A. I have removed the reference to the tennis court and the flagpole. The flagpole on "holy shit" point is part of the application for Parcel Remainder C-1. The flagpole on or near to Remainder A is a part of CZM Permit No. CZT-0S-17L. Therefore it doesn't need to be shown and may actually create confu
rmal">From: jeffrey E= imailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:42 AM <=>To: John P. Woods; Daphne Wallace Subject: Re: GSJ Minor Pe=mit-Parcel Remainder A flagpole is in wrong =ocation, it is on holy shit point tennis court was already removed. . EF
that point • M, John P. Woods wrote: I will remove the note on the tennis court. Where is holy =hit point? If it is not on Parcel Remainder A or Parcel Remainder C-1, it =ay get bumped into the major permit. Of course, if you had the location ap=roved before under Permit No. CZT-05-17, you don't need to show it=i
Entities connected to both Daphne Wallace and Parcel Remainder C-1