Epstein Secrets

l at some period of time." Id. citing Gregory I. Mitchell 634 F.2d 199, 203 (5th Cir. 1981). Further, "[w]h

utilizing the non- prosecution agreement to seek money damages from Epstein. After receiving written notice in January 2009 from the U.S. Attorney's Office of Epstein's guilty pleas and the potential of obtaining compensation from Epstein, Jane Doe No. 3 contacted Robert Josefsberg, Esq., the attorney referenced in

l at some period of time." Id. citing Gregory I. Mitchell, 634 F.2d 199, 203 (56 Cir. 1981). Further, "[w]h

utilizing the non- prosecution agreement to seek money damages from Epstein. After receiving written notice in January 2009 from the U.S. Attorney's Office of Epstein's guilty pleas and the potential of obtaining compensation from Epstein, Jane Doe No. 3 contacted Robert Josefsberg, Esq., the attorney referenced in

that the "[m]ere passage of time need not result in a denial of leave to amend, but delay becomes fatal at some period of time." Id. ugt Gregory t Mitchell, 634 F.2d 199, 203 (5'h Cir. 1981). Further, "[w]hen there has been an apparent lack of diligence, the burden shifts to the movant to prove that the

utilizing the non-prosecution agreement to seek money damages from Epstein. After receiving written notice in January 2009 from the U.S. Attorney's Office of Epstein's guilty pleas and the potential of obtaining compensation from Epstein, Jane Doe No. 3 contacted the attorney referenced in the notification letter,