Epstein Secrets

ve the letters that 20 chat is that those exhibits were listed for the 21 confirm the written agreement with every detail of 21 first time in Mitch, which would have been three 22 that agreement in place -- those wore turned over 22 days ago, and discussed perhaps within the last few 23 as

ank you. IS there's no need to prove publication. 14 Mr. Burlington? 16 When I say • publication, • I'm talking about 17 MR. BURLINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 the consumption of that information by another la behalf of Brad Edwards. IS party and that party's -- and the effect ca that Is

ve the letters that 20 chat is that those exhibits were listed for the 21 confirm the written agreement with every detail of 21 first time in Mitch, which would have been three 22 that agreement in place -- those wore turned over 22 days ago, and discussed perhaps within the last few 23 as

ank you. IS there's no need to prove publication. 14 Mr. Burlington? 16 When I say • publication, • I'm talking about 17 MR. BURLINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 the consumption of that information by another la behalf of Brad Edwards. IS party and that party's -- and the effect ca that Is

he defendant acted willfully or maliciously in disregarding the injunction, then the court may cite the defendant for criminal contempt." Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 769 (11th Cir. 1990) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) (stating, "[a] court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or impri

(561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards 22 EFTA00799335 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6323 Filed 03/19/18 Page 23 of 23 Phil Burlington, Esq. Nichole J. Segal, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected] Burlington &Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West P