Epstein Secrets

tions. But I saw guests at the 11 house that were celebrities. 12 Q. Who did you see at house? 13 A. Many. It was senators. It was Senator 14 Mitchell. George Mitchell. It was Prince Andrew. It 15 was Princess Sarah. 16 Q. Princess? 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 19

I saw guests at the 11 house that were celebrities. 12 Q. Who did you see at house? 13 A. Many. It was senators. It was Senator 14 Mitchell. George Mitchell. It was Prince Andrew. It 15 was Princess Sarah. 16 Q. Princess? 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 19 A. Ferguson. 20

behalf of the Plaintiffs: 3 RICHARD WILLITS. ESQUIRE WILLITS. P.A. 6 7 a 12 13 14 15 16 17 STUART MERMELS1EIN. ESQUIRE WILLIAM J. BER ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER KATHERINE W. F2ELL, ESQUIRE PODHURSTORSECK. P.A. Is 19 ADAM I. LANCING. ESQUIRE 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 Page 4 EXHIBITS NUMBER DESCRIPTI

ight years. "[T]he requirements of due process in a civil contempt proceeding are flexible, varying with the circumstances of each case." Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 769 n.11 (11th Cir. 1990). The Intervenors' damages claims are fraught with material factual issues which support allowing the pre-h

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, M., Debtor. CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO THE INTERVENORS' RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO TAKE THE INTERVENORS'

be represented by counsel, can introduce evidence rebutting the allegation of contempt and testify on its own behalf." Id. at 1324 (citing Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 767 (11th Cir. 1990)). The Court will refrain from considering criminal contempt, punitive sanctions, or incarceration because of th

nited States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA www.fisb.uscourts.gov Fort Lauderdale Division In re: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA, Debtor. Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR Chapter 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FOWLER WHITE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT AND S

pstein has made a prima facie showing warranting certiorari relief. See Bared & Co. v. McGuire 670 So. 2d 153, 157-58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); see also Mitchell v. State, 911 So. 2d 1211, 1219 (Fla. 2005) (explaining that a "principal consideration n" for 4 09/12/2079 age 3407 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Age

: JEFFREY H. SLOMAN U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 WILLIAM J. BERGER ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER 401 Fast Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Counsel for E.W. SPENCER T. KUVIN DIANA L. MARTIN LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. 2925 P

opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore, 786 So.2d 521 (Fla. 7 EFTA00175248 6se 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Page 9 of 12 others, diminis

ered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 17 of 18 Respectfully Submitted, Plaintiff, by One of Her Counsel, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimile Florida Bar 'o.: E-mail: CERTIFICAT