Epstein Secrets

marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed herein. From: [mailto Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:39 PM To: Michaels, Philip 1; Joshua Schmell Cc: Jeffrey Epstein; Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Jamie Dyce 212 471 1888 re: Siegal Phil: When can we expect some move

From: ' To: "Joshua Schmell" <:1 Cc: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey Epstein" <1 Subject: Re: Jamie Dyce 212 471 1888 re: Siegal Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:18:59 +0000 Ok with me...Jeffrey? Peg Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T From: Joshua Schmell Date: Mo

as I appear be, I really have no understanding of what is going on. Any advise you can share would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Peggy From: Michaels, Philip J. [mailto: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 09:50 PM To: Peggy Siegal Cc Subject: Re: Tax Deadline/Oct 15th No one has called me.the at

mailto: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 09:50 PM To: Peggy Siegal Cc Subject: Re: Tax Deadline/Oct 15th No one has called me.the atty's name is Jamie Dyce. I will send her contact info tomorrow. Phil Philip J. Michaels Fulbright & Jaworski LLP 666 Fifth Avenue NY. NY 10103-3198 Sent from my BlackB

From: ' To: "Michaels, Philip J." < >, "Joshua Schmell" Cc: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey Epstein" Subject: Re: Jamie Dyce 212 471 1888 re: Siegal

From: ' To: "Michaels, Philip J." < >, "Joshua Schmell" Cc: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey Epstein" Subject: Re: Jamie Dyce 212 471 1888 re: Siegal Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:38:46 +0000 Phil: When can we expect some movement? Does this mean Gary's lawyer and his account

From: Joshua Schmell < To: "Michaels, Phili ) J." s < > CC: "Klingel, John" -1 >, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Estate Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:3

els, Philip J. [mailto: Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 3:03 PM To: ; Joshua Schmell Cc: Klingel, John Subject: Estate Peggy/Josh I spoke with Jamie Dyce this morning. She gave me some figures which I will list below but I have now asked that the original "accounting" that we received last year, be u