Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (259)
Entities connected to both Boston and Fourth Amendment
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON61 w/ Boston·6 w/ Fourth
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON17 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
United States
LOCATION15 w/ Boston·6 w/ Fourth
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON16 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON12 w/ Boston·6 w/ Fourth
Palm Beach
LOCATION14 w/ Boston·3 w/ Fourth
Oregon
LOCATION12 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
Bradley Edwards
PERSON12 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
North Carolina
LOCATION12 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
Michael Jackson
PERSON11 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
Adriana Ross
PERSON11 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
Sacramento
LOCATION11 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
AL
Alfonso
PERSON9 w/ Boston·6 w/ Fourth
Martinez
PERSON10 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
Colorado
LOCATION10 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Boston·6 w/ Fourth
Anderson
PERSON10 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth
WA
Walsh
PERSON10 w/ Boston·5 w/ Fourth