Epstein Secrets

AM To: Cc: Subject: FW: Material Witness PA C See below on the MLAT. The only issue for you is the one I raised briefly earlier this week — the Home Office doesn't think we're predicated on and unless we provide further specifics about Andrew's knowledge of or involvement in criminal conduct in that c

een looking for us to exhaust all avenues for voluntary cooperation. They expect that once they approve the MLA and refer it to the police that the Blackfords will file a judicial review action. In that action, they believe Blackfords will claim that the Home Office failed to follow its internal guidelines

ing to voluntarily assist, and then again sent a letter after learning of the MLA request. One thing we talked about was the back and forth between Blackfords and you in June. I said we were somewhat concerned about sharing that correspondence with them because of the inevitable claim that Blackfords woul

20 9:02 AM To: Subject: FW: Material Witness PA See below on the MLAT. The only issue for you is the one I raised briefly earlier this week — the Home Office doesn't think we're predicated on and unless we provide further specifics about Andrew's knowledge of or involvement in criminal conduct in that c

een looking for us to exhaust all avenues for voluntary cooperation. They expect that once they approve the MLA and refer it to the police that the Blackfords will file a judicial review action. In that action, they believe Blackfords will claim that the Home Office failed to follow its internal guidelines

ing to voluntarily assist, and then again sent a letter after learning of the MLA request. One thing we talked about was the back and forth between Blackfords and you in June. I said we were somewhat concerned about sharing that correspondence with them because of the inevitable claim that Blackfords woul

hich voluntary cooperation is not possible. Blackfords will argue that since they have offered voluntary cooperation as recently as early June, the Home Office failed to properly apply its internal guidelines, and the court should direct the Home Office to vacate its approval of the MLA request and send it

een looking for us to exhaust all avenues for voluntary cooperation. They expect that once they approve the MLA and refer it to the police that the Blackfords will file a judicial review action. In that action, they believe Blackfords will claim that the Home Office failed to follow its internal guidelines

ing to voluntarily assist, and then again sent a letter after learning of the MLA request. One thing we talked about was the back and forth between Blackfords and you in June. I said we were somewhat concerned about sharing that correspondence with them because of the inevitable claim that Blackfords woul

2 AM To: Subject: FW: Material Witness PA See below on the MLAT. The only issue for you is the Nygard one I raised briefly earlier this week — the Home Office doesn't think we're predicated on Nygard, and unless we provide further specifics about Andrew's knowledge of or involvement in criminal conduct in

een looking for us to exhaust all avenues for voluntary cooperation. They expect that once they approve the MLA and refer it to the police that the Blackfords will file a judicial review action. In that action, they believe Blackfords will claim that the Home Office failed to follow its internal guidelines

ing to voluntarily assist, and then again sent a letter after learning of the MLA request. One thing we talked about was the back and forth between Blackfords and you in June. I said we were somewhat concerned about sharing that correspondence with them because of the inevitable claim that Blackfords woul

hich voluntary cooperation is not possible. Blackfords will argue that since they have offered voluntary cooperation as recently as early June, the Home Office failed to properly apply its internal guidelines, and the court should direct the Home Office to vacate its approval of the MLA request and send it

een looking for us to exhaust all avenues for voluntary cooperation. They expect that once they approve the MLA and refer it to the police that the Blackfords will file a judicial review action. In that action, EFTA00094918 they believe Blackfords will claim that the Home Office failed to follow its inte

ing to voluntarily assist, and then again sent a letter after learning of the MLA request. One thing we talked about was the back and forth between Blackfords and you in June. I said we were somewhat concerned about sharing that correspondence with them because of the inevitable claim that Blackfords woul