Epstein Secrets

pt the relevant rule of New York landlord-tenant law for purposes of deciding the remaining issue in this dis- pute, and hold that, consistent with New York law, OFM was entitled to arbitrarily withhold its consent to Epstein's request to sublet the Premises to Fisher. Even assum- ing OFM had a hidden a

d in part and denied in part. I. Federal Courts .3=409 In diversity action, federal court sitting in New York must apply New York law, including New York's choice-of-law rules. 2. Contracts e=s144 Under New York's choice-of-law rules, when court is construing meaning of con- tract, court should apply

t may not be introduced to create ambiguity. Arthur M. Handler, Whitman & Ransom, New York City, for plaintiff. Elliot Silverman, Cold & Wachtel, New York City, for defendant. ORDER CONBOY, District Judge: We have before us an action for breach of contract. Plaintiff Michael R. Stroll ("Stroll") see

e by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Re- public of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("0FM") of the United States Department of State took poas.ssion of the budding pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. § 4301 of seq. 0F

the Premises to the Government. Defendant Ellyn Bank ("Bank") is a resident of the State of New York with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Bank is named as a defendant because she has been an unapproved occupant of the Premises; has availed herself of the use and benefits of

nformation and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action by plaintiff United States of America (the "Government") on behalf of the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State (the "State Department") against defendants Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Epstein"), Ivan S. Fisher ("Fisher

") is a resident of the SONY_GM_02742767 EFTA _00229416 EFTA01324982 State of New York with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Bank is named as a defendant because she has been an unapproved occupant of the Premises; has availed herself of the use and benefits of the Premis

nformation and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action by plaintiff United States of America (the "Government") on behalf of the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States SONY_GM_02742766 EFTA _00229415 EFTA01324981 Department of State (the "State Department") against defendants Jeffre

York, Pro Se. Jessie Siegel a/k/a Jesse Siegel, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Siegel, Martin & Heilbrun, By Robert Heilbrun, Esq., A Partner of the Firm, New York, Pro Se. Ron Soffer, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Carmen Tausik, Esq., New York, Pro Se. OPINION CHIN, D.J. *1 In this case, the United States (the "

ence by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Republic of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State took possession of the building pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. OFM