Epstein Secrets

igned To Impose Reporting Requirements Upon Offenders In Proportion To The Threat They Pose To The Public So That They May Be Adequately Monitored New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168 et aL is intended to impose the most stringent reporting requirements on those sex offend

registration requirements here in New York -- if indeed it qualifies as registerable at all. At most, Mr. Epstein was guilty of a misdemeanor under New York law, and accordingly, his registration obligations under SORA should reflect this relative lack of severity of his offense. Even under the broader

belongs. II. Jeffrey Epstein Poses Little To No Threat Of Reoffending Or Causing Harm To The Public Safety Of The People Of New York A. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the first and primary factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offenses

n the Information, he received massages and engaged in sexual touching in exchange for money with A.D., a young woman over the age of consent under New York law for all but two months of the fourteen month period during which this conduct is alleged to have occurred Asut--just-under--1-8-fer--all-but-two

ng Requirements Upon Offenders In Proportion To The Threat They Pose To The Public So That They May Be Adequately Monitored As you are well aware, New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168 et at is intended to impose the most stringent reporting requirements on those sex offen

belongs. II. Jeffrey Epstein Poses Little To No Threat Of Reoffending Or Causing Harm To The Public Safety Of The People Of New York A. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the first and primary factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey-Mr. Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offe

Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 5, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168 et aL is intended to impose the most stringent reporting requirements on those sex offend

rk and Florida, just barely falls within the range of conduct viewed as sufficiently harmful to trigger SORA registration requirements. B. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the second factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offenses. Indeed, t