Epstein Secrets

igned To Impose Reporting Requirements Upon Offenders In Proportion To The Threat They Pose To The Public So That They May Be Adequately Monitored New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168 et aL is intended to impose the most stringent reporting requirements on those sex offend

registration requirements here in New York -- if indeed it qualifies as registerable at all. At most, Mr. Epstein was guilty of a misdemeanor under New York law, and accordingly, his registration obligations under SORA should reflect this relative lack of severity of his offense. Even under the broader

his SORA designation reflect that fact. B. The Level 3 Calculation by the Board Is Not Supported by Facts or the Law Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Jeffrey Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that suggesting that he might pos

d the reasoned determinations of other jurisdictions having greater contact and control over Mr. Epstein, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in New York has recommended that Mr. Epstein be categorized as a Level 3 sex offender. Such a harsh designation would subject Jeffrey Epstein to a lifetime obli

oted that the New York cognate of this crime, Promoting Prostitution in the Third Degree, P.L. § 230.25, is not itself a registerable offense under New York's New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168-a(2). Moreover, the conduct underlying this conviction -- a consensual arrange

th to abide by the law unconditionally, and the reasoned determinations of other jurisdictions having greater contact and control over Mr. Epstein, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in New York has recommended that Mr. Epstein be categorized as a Level 3 sex offender. Such a harsh designation would subject Jeffrey Epstein to a

n the Information, he received massages and engaged in sexual touching in exchange for money with A.D., a young woman over the age of consent under New York law for all but two months of the fourteen month period during which this conduct is alleged to have occurred Asut--just-under--1-8-fer--all-but-two

ng Requirements Upon Offenders In Proportion To The Threat They Pose To The Public So That They May Be Adequately Monitored As you are well aware, New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168 et at is intended to impose the most stringent reporting requirements on those sex offen

& ELLIS LLP demonstrated a commitment to go beyond what is demanded of him to remain in full compliance with the law. Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Mr. Jeffrey-Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that even remotely suggesting

Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 5, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168 et aL is intended to impose the most stringent reporting requirements on those sex offend

his SORA designation reflect that fact. B. The Level 3 Calculation by the Board Is Not Supported by Facts or the Law Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Jeffrey Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that suggesting that he might pos

Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss-one of the law firms representing Mr. Epstein. Richard Kahn is a partner at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell in New York and has no association with the Atterbury firm. Checking public records available on the Internet, I located the IRS returns of "The C.O.U.Q. Found

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss—one of the law firms representing Mr. Epstein. Richard Kahn is a partner at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell in New York and has no association with the Atterbury firm. Checking public records available on the internet, I located the IRS returns of "The C.O.U.Q. Found

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting