4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
6 / 4
Mentions
s scheduled to appear before the Honorable Ruth Pickholz in New York Supreme Court, Part 66, on Tuesday, November 9, 2010 for a hearing pursuant to New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168 et seq.. We respectfully submit this letter and the accompanying materials for your cons
of all, because the offense which triggered the registration requirement in Florida — and then, solely by virtue of Correction Law § 168-a(d)(2), in New York — would not have been a registerable offense at all (and almost certainly would have only been a misdemeanor) had it been committed in New York inst
at it will not require Mr. Epstein to register at all under that state's sexual offender reporting statute. See Letter of Regina Chacon, New Mexico Department of Public Safety to Jeffery E. Epstein, August 19, 2010 (Exhibit C); see also NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-3(E). As previously noted, notwithstanding the state's determinati
d the reasoned determinations of other jurisdictions having greater contact and control over Mr. Epstein, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in New York has recommended that Mr. Epstein be categorized as a Level 3 sex offender. Such a harsh designation would subject Jeffrey Epstein to a lifetime obli
oted that the New York cognate of this crime, Promoting Prostitution in the Third Degree, P.L. § 230.25, is not itself a registerable offense under New York's New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law § 168-a(2). Moreover, the conduct underlying this conviction -- a consensual arrange
at it will not require Mr. Epstein to register at all under that state's sexual offender reporting statute. See Letter of Regina Chacon, New Mexico Department of Public Safety to Jeffery E. Epstein, August 19, 2010 (Exhibit C); see also NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-3(E). As previously noted, notwithstanding the state's determinati
court. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3142. EFTA00066193 U.S. v. EPSTEIN Cite u423 F.Supp.34 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) Pro Hac Vice, United States Attorney's Office, New York, NY, Gloria Rachel Allred, Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, Los Angeles, CA, for Government. James L. Brochin, Michael Campion Miller, Michael Gerard S
ostitution." Dkt. 25, Ex. A. The Court requested from the Defense all application materials that Mr. Epstein may have submitted to the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, believing that the Department would not initiate the waiver of Mr. Epstein's sex offense registration on its own. No such materials have been re
court. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3142. EFTA00076817 U.S. v. EPSTEIN Cite u423 F.Supp.34 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) Pro Hac Vice, United States Attorney's Office, New York, NY, Gloria Rachel Allred, Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, Los Angeles, CA, for Government. James L. Brochin, Michael Campion Miller, Michael Gerard S
ostitution." Dkt. 25, Ex. A. The Court requested from the Defense all application materials that Mr. Epstein may have submitted to the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, believing that the Department would not initiate the waiver of Mr. Epstein's sex offense registration on its own. No such materials have been re
Entities connected to both New York and Department of Public Safety

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
New York City
LOCATION
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION
George Mitchell
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Palm Beach
LOCATION
New York State
LOCATION
Michael Jackson
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON
Vicky Ward
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Oliver Stone
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONThe New York Post
ORGANIZATIONCourtney Wild
PERSON