Epstein Secrets

o victims."). Ms. was introduced by her counsel, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the misfortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. said that Mr. Epstein "flew [her] to New Mexico" and was "inappropriate" with her. a She was reluctant to go into details abou

s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid

Ms. -was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the misfortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms. Farmer said that Mr. Epstein "flew [her) to New Mexico" and was "inappropriate" with her. Id. She was reluctant to go into

s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid

o victims."). Ms. was introduced by her counsel, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the misfortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms.Maid that Mr. Epstein "flew [her] to New Mexico" and was "inappropriate" with her. Id. She was reluctant to go into details

s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid

benefits to victims."). Ms, was introduced by her counsel, and stated that she was when she "had the misfortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms.Msaid that Mr. Epstein "flew [her] tol arid was "inappropriate" with her. a She was reluctant to go into details about her

s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid