Epstein Secrets

on a articular day and would ask if should be available after they arrived. During these calls, remembers Maxwell ca ing om a phone number with a New York area code. At other times. Maxwell called from Palm Beach. When Maxwell scheduled for an appointment. she would as or address so that a car coul

lly relevant to our case. We are in the process of reviewing that subset of emails. Third, we are still in the process of loading scans of the full USAO-SDFL file into Relativity so that our team can conduct a full review of that file. Due to technical issues with the vendor who scanned the files in Flori

dition of the NPA and his state sentence, was required to register as a sex offender in the locations of his residences. He is currently registered New York's age of consent was 17 at the time of the alleged conduct and remains so today. See N.Y. Penal Law § 130.05. 2 EFTA00058430 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RM

mber 24, 2007, after a year-long investigation, the Department of Justice, through the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"), entered into the NPA with Mr. Epstein. The NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from five distinct potential federal charges that "may have been committed

USAO for this District in its investigation of Epstein, and that attorneys from the USAO-SDFL traveled to New York and interviewed and/or subpoenaed New York-based witnesses. Privilege Log, Doe v. United States, Case No. 9:08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkt. No. 212-1 (filed July 19, 2013) ("SDFL Privilege Log"

squarely refutes the government's position. The co-conspirator immunity provision does not prohibit merely prosecutions by the USAO for the SDFL ("USAO-SDFL"), but by "the United States." This broad prohibition was intentional, as demonstrated by the express references elsewhere in the NPA to the United

tion of the NPA and his state sentence, was required to register as a sex offender in the locations of his residences. He is currently registered ' New York's age of consent was 17 at the time of the alleged conduct and remains so today. See N.Y. Penal Law § 130.05. 2 EFTA00076069 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RM

mber 24, 2007, after a year-long investigation, the Department of Justice, through the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"), entered into the NPA with Mr. Epstein. The NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from five distinct potential federal charges that "may have been committed

tion of the NPA and his state sentence, was required to register as a sex offender in the locations of his residences. He is currently registered ' New York's age of consent was 17 at the time of the alleged conduct and remains so today. See N.Y. Penal Law § 130.05. 2 EFTA00095872 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RM

mber 24, 2007, after a year-long investigation, the Department of Justice, through the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"), entered into the NPA with Mr. Epstein. The NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from five distinct potential federal charges that "may have been committed

dition of the NPA and his state sentence, was required to register as a sex offender in the locations of his residences. He is currently registered New York's age of consent was 17 at the time of the alleged conduct and remains so today. See N.Y. Penal Law § 130.05. 2 EFTA00097461 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RM

mber 24, 2007, after a year-long investigation, the Department of Justice, through the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"), entered into the NPA with Mr. Epstein. The NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from five distinct potential federal charges that "may have been committed

the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is an illegal con

have limited the USAO-SDFL' s capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c

the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is an illegal con

have limited the USAO-SDFL' s capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c

USAO for this District in its investigation of Epstein, and that attorneys from the USAO-SDFL traveled to New York and interviewed and/or subpoenaed New York-based witnesses. Privilege Log, Doe v. United States, Case No. 9:08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkt. No. 212-1 (filed July 19, 2013) ("SDFL Privilege Log"

squarely refutes the government's position. The co-conspirator immunity provision does not prohibit merely prosecutions by the USAO for the SDFL ("USAO-SDFL"), but by "the United States." This broad prohibition was intentional, as demonstrated by the express references elsewhere in the NPA to the United

the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is an illegal con

have limited the USAO-SDFL's capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c