Epstein Secrets

g the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #11 attended the Professional Performing Arts School, a public high school, located in New York, New York. 25. During the period of her involvernent with the Defendants, Jane Doe #13 attended John I. Leonard High School in Palm Beach County.

t to seek that particular sentence does not change the fact that the sentence was available to the State and rejected in its discretion. Therefore, Petite's presumption that the State of Florida's prior prosecution of Mr. Epstein has vindicated the federal interest cannot be said to have been overcome

secution Agreement stated: "after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure [contained in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement)." See e.g., September 17, 2007 email from M. Vill

n Teterboro. Mr. Epstein then re-directed his airplane, making the pilot file a new flight plan to travel to the U.S. Virgin Islands instead of the New York City area, thereby Special A ems from serving the target letters on Ms. • d Ms. During the course of that ffigh th tSefendant verbally harassed both

greement; and IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern Dist

s false allegations and in light of the new evidence we had uncovered, including six confirmed additional victims and three potential new victims in New York (id.). I don't recall receiving any response. Despite that communication to Epstein's counsel, the Office continued towards indictment. On February

e was insufficient evidence to charge him with any offense; (b) there was no basis for federal prosecution and that federal prosecution violated the Petite policy; (c) I had engaged in prosecutorial misconduct during the investigation and resolution of the matter; (d) Jeff had engaged inprosecutorial

in Tete ro. Mr. Epstein then re-directed his airplane, making the pilot file a new flight plan to travel to the U.S. Virgin Islands instead of the New York City area, thereby kee in the Specialieits from serving the target letters on Ms. and Ms. . During t} a cowseoof that flight efendant verbally harasse

Agreement and IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern Dist

s false allegations and in light of the new evidence we had uncovered, including six confirmed additional victims and three potential new victims in New York (id.). I don't recall receiving any response. Despite that communication to Epstein's counsel, the Office continued towards indictment. On February

e was insufficient evidence to charge him with any offense; (b) there was no basis for federal prosecution and that federal prosecution violated the Petite policy; (c) I had engaged in prosecutorial misconduct during the investigation and resolution of the matter; (d) Jeff Sloman had engaged in prosecu

I and I looked into this and do not believe that any of it is true.” Villafaña told OPR that the rumor that Epstein had cooperated with the case in New York was “completely false.” Acosta told OPR that he did not have any information about Epstein cooperating in a financial investigation or relating to

ngle forum in which to proceed to satisfy the substantial federal and state interests involved.” If a substantial question arises as to whether the Petite policy applies to a particular prosecution, the prosecutor should submit the matter to the appropriate Assistant Attorney General for resolution.