3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
cy, unjust enrichment, and misappropriation of trade secrets, as well as other related claims. Mr. Morley contends that he was an equal partner with Jack Dorsey and Jim McKelvey in the business enterprise that ultimately evolved into Square, and that Mr. Dorsey and Mr. McKelvey breached their alleged oral jo
commercial disputes, and other matters. For example, we have been served with a putative class action complaint filed on behalf of couriers for our Caviar subsidiary alleging that the couriers have been improperly denied reimbursement for business expenses due to their classification as independent con
ise found unpatentable by the Patent Office Trial and Appeals Board. On January 30, 2014, Mr. Morley and REM filed a complaint against the Company, Jack Dorsey, and Mr. McKelvey, again in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-00172), alleging that th
er. On March 19, 2015. Jeffry Levin filed a putative class action lawsuit against Caviar, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Square), alleging that Caviar misclassified Mr. Levin and other similarly situated couriers as independent contractors under the provisions of the California Labor Code and claim
of all of Mr. Morley's and REM's remaining claims of the patents in the 2010 Complaint, Mr. Morley and REM filed a complaint against us and against Jack Dorsey and Mr. McKelvey, in the District Court, alleging that the formation of Square and the development of our card reader and decoding technologies con
ide class, filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of California against our wholly owned subsidiary, Caviar, Inc., which, as amended, alleges that Caviar misclassified Mr. Levin and other similarly situated couriers as independent contractors and, in doing so, violated various provisions of 146 Tabl
Entities connected to both Jack Dorsey and Caviar