Epstein Secrets

cy, unjust enrichment, and misappropriation of trade secrets, as well as other related claims. Mr. Morley contends that he was an equal partner with Jack Dorsey and Jim McKelvey in the business enterprise that ultimately evolved into Square, and that Mr. Dorsey and Mr. McKelvey breached their alleged oral jo

erms, this could affect our ability to use certain intellectual property and could also result in substantial monetary liabilities. In addition, Mr. Morley filed a subsequent lawsuit containing allegations that the formation of Square and the development of our card reader and decoding technologies cons

ise found unpatentable by the Patent Office Trial and Appeals Board. On January 30, 2014, Mr. Morley and REM filed a complaint against the Company, Jack Dorsey, and Mr. McKelvey, again in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-00172), alleging that th

e recently amended claims, which have not yet progressed beyond preliminary reexamination, all of the claims from the three patents asserted in Mr. Morley's 2010 complaint have either been canceled or otherwise found unpatentable by the Patent Office Trial and Appeals Board. On January 30, 2014, Mr. M

of all of Mr. Morley's and REM's remaining claims of the patents in the 2010 Complaint, Mr. Morley and REM filed a complaint against us and against Jack Dorsey and Mr. McKelvey, in the District Court, alleging that the formation of Square and the development of our card reader and decoding technologies con

ed or otherwise found unpatentable by the PTAB. On January 30, 2014, three weeks after the PTAB hearing that resulted in the rejection of all of Mr. Morley's and REM's remaining claims of the patents in the 2010 Complaint, Mr. Morley and REM filed a complaint against us and against Jack Dorsey and Mr.