Epstein Secrets

c osure character st a. Cross-sect ona (continued) EFTA00088902 t Table I. (cont nued) u. Study Purpose Des gn Samp e F ndngs Summary Kogan (2004) Goodman-Brown, Ede ste n, Goodman, Jones, and Gordon (2003) The purpose of th s study was to dent fy factors that of uence the d sc os

xual abuse disclosures, and she is a researcher on the "Make Resilience Matter" project examining childhood exposure to domestic violence with Dr. Alaggia at the Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto. EFTA00088912 Child Abuse Review Vol. 24: 159-169 (2015) Published online

isclosure is being viewed as a dynamic, rather than static, process and described "not as a single event but rather a carefully measured process" (Alaggia, 2005, p. 455). The catalyst for this view originates from Summit (I 983) who initially conceptualized CSA disclo- sures as process based, although

nd disclosure characteristics. Cross-sectional (continued) EFTA00156877 Table I. (continued) Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary Kogan (2004) Goodman-Brown. Edelstein. Goodman. Jones. and Gordon (2003) The purpose of this study was co identify factors chat influence the discl

tered unsupportive responses which is high (continued) EFTA00156873 t4 Table I. (continued) Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary Alaggia and Kirshenbaum The objectives of the (2005) current study were to identify a broad range of factors. including family dynamics that contribut

a. Cross-sect ona (continued) EFTA00024189 --- PAGE BREAK --- ;el a. Table I. (cont nued) Study Purpose Des gn Samp e F ndngs Summary Kogan (2004) Goodman-Brown, Ede ste n. Goodman. Jones, and Gordon (2003) The purpose of th s study was to dent fy factors that of uence the d sc os

isclosure is being viewed as a dynamic, rather than static, process and described "not as a single event but rather a carefully measured process" (Alaggia, 2005, p. 455). The catalyst for this view originates from Summit (I 983) who initially conceptualized CSA disclo- sures as process based, although

ntly of intrapersonal factors of child victims, knowledge construction has shifted to fuller social— ecological, person-in-environment explanations (Alaggia, 2010; Collin-Vezina et al., 2015; Easton et al., 2014; Hunter, 2011; Ungar, Tutty, McConnell, Barter, & Fairholm, 2009b). Social-ecological expla