Epstein Secrets

To: From: Kevin Maxwell Sent: Tue 10/29/2002 12:21:30 PM Subject: RE: Victoria Aitken Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn. He has a background in chancery - ie general

ases. End of the day if you are recommending anyone you always need to know about the case as QCs are very much horses for courses. But bottom line Moverly Smith is young and relatively inexperienced. Warren - nice but dry as dust. Neither are great on charisma and neither are top drawer and absolutely would

To: From: Kevin Maxwell Sent: Tue 10/29/2002 12:21:30 PM Subject: RE: Victoria Aitken Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn. He has a background in chancery - ie general commercial with strong background in government work - he is quite young just ma

Charisma? What type of case his he trying to win and who is up against? Original Message > From: SMTP > Sent: 28 October, 2002 4:53 PM > To: Kevin Maxwell > Subject: Re: Victoria Aitken > Boo - got your message - no problem. A friend of mine is looking to hite a > lawyer and he is interviewing Steve

e as he will not use either of the QCs that you sd no to. My friend is called Dr henry JArecki Thanks G At 12:21 PM 10/29/2002 +0000, you wrote: Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn. He has a background in chancery - ie general commercial with strong background in government work - he is quite young just ma

ases. End of the day if you are recommending anyone you always need to know about the case as QCs are very much horses for courses. But bottom line Moverly Smith is young and relatively inexperienced. Warren - nice but dry as dust. Neither are great on charisma and neither are top drawer and absolutely woul

From: "G. Max" 1MIMIMI=> To: Kevin Maxwell Subject: RE: Victoria Aitken Date: Sat, 01 Jan 4501 05:00:00 +0000 <html> Kev - spoke to my friend - the case involves a 60 moorings that were or

one of major schemes in Maxwell<br> &gt; affair? Any thoughts on either of them<br> &gt; <br> &gt; G<br> &gt; On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:56:42 -0000 Kevin Maxwell &lt; .<br> &gt; wrote:<br> &gt; <br> &gt; &gt; Victoria is now living in New York - Please add<br> &gt; &gt; her to your party list!<br> &gt; &gt;

friend is called Dr henry JArecki<br> <br> Thanks<br> G<br> At 12:21 PM 10/29/2002 +0000, you wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn.&nbsp; He has a background in chancery - ie<br> general commercial with strong background in government work - he is quite<br>

From: "G. Max" 1MIMIMI=> To: Kevin Maxwell Subject: RE: Victoria Aitken Date: Sat, 01 Jan 4501 05:00:00 +0000 <html> Kev - spoke to my friend - the case involves a 60 moorings that were or

one of major schemes in Maxwell<br> &gt; affair? Any thoughts on either of them<br> &gt; <br> &gt; G<br> &gt; On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:56:42 -0000 Kevin Maxwell &lt; .<br> &gt; wrote:<br> &gt; <br> &gt; &gt; Victoria is now living in New York - Please add<br> &gt; &gt; her to your party list!<br> &gt; &gt;

friend is called Dr henry JArecki<br> <br> Thanks<br> G<br> At 12:21 PM 10/29/2002 +0000, you wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn.&nbsp; He has a background in chancery - ie<br> general commercial with strong background in government work - he is quite<br>

From: "G. Max" <IMIMMI=> To: Kevin Maxwell Subject: RE: Victoria Aitken Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 15:16:28 +0000 <html> Key - spoke to my friend - the case involves a 60 moorings that were or

one of major schemes in Maxwell<br> &gt; affair? Any thoughts on either of them<br> &gt; <br> &gt; G<br> &gt; On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:56:42 -0000 Kevin Maxwell &It <br> &gt; wrote:<br> &gt; <br> &gt; &gt; Victoria is now living in New York - Please add<br> &gt; &gt; her to your party list!<br> &gt; &gt;

friend is called Dr henry JArecki<br> <br> Thanks<br> Cr<br> At 12:21 PM 10/29/2002 +0000, you wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn.&nbsp; He has a background in chancery - ie<br> general commercial with strong background in government work - he is quite<br>

f one of major schemes in Maxwell<br> &gt; affair? Any thoughts on either of them<br> &gt; <br> &gt; G<br> &gt; On Mon 28 Oct 2002 08:56:42 -0000 Kevin Maxwell &it; <br> &gt; wrote:<br> &gt; <br> &gt; &gt; Victoria is now living in New York - Please add<br> &gt; &gt; her to your party list!<br> &gt; &gt;

friend is called Dr henry JArecki<br> <br> Thanks<br> G<br> At 12:21 PM 10/29/2002 ♦0000, you wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn.&nbsp; He has a background in chancery - ie<br> general commercial with strong background in government work - he is quite<br>

en a trustee for of one of major schemes in Maxwell<br> &gt; affair? Any thoughts on either of them<br> &gt; <br> &gt; G<br> &gt; A • • -0000 Kevin Maxwell &it; &gt; &gt; <br> &gt; &gt; Victoria is now living in New York - Please add<br> &gt; &gt; her to your party list!<br> &gt; &gt; Lots of love<br>

friend is called Dr henry JArecki<br> <br> Thanks<br> G<br> At 12:21 PM 10/29/2002 ♦0000, you wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn.&nbsp; He has a background in chancery - ie<br> general commercial with strong background in government work - he is quite<br>

From: Kevin Maxwell To: 1.1==IMM II Subject: RE: Victoria Aitken Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:21:30 +0000 Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn. He has a background in chan

From: Kevin Maxwell To: 1.1==IMM II Subject: RE: Victoria Aitken Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:21:30 +0000 Moverly Smith did not act for Bunn. He has a background in chancery - ie general commercial with strong background in government work - he is quite young just mad