Epstein Secrets

v. United States, 08-CV-80736-ICAM M. Fla.), Dkt 324 at 5. In addition, in that very same litigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Timothy R. Slater filed a declaration stating that when Jane Doe 3 was interviewed by the FBI in 2007 she refused to cooperate with the investigation of Mr. Epstein

ssured into including Professor Dershowitz in her allegations and that she has a financial motive in making these allegations. The Duke of York and the Royal Palace have likewise unequivocally denied Jane Doe's similar allegations against the Duke. Surely, these unequivocal statements of denial of respected mem

sidering airing, found them to be "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." A filed affidavit in that case from FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater reflects that when Jane Doe 3 was first interviewed she refused to cooperate with the investigation of Mr. Epstein declaring she wanted nothing to d

ve funds herself) from a businessperson who would persuasively deny that he ever had any sexual contact with Jane Doe 3. Likewise, Prince Andrew and the Royal Palace have unequivocally denied similar allegations of sexual conduct by Prince Andrew. Surely there is nothing in the background of either the Prince or

sidering airing, found them to be "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." A filed affidavit in that case from FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater reflects that when Jane Doe 3 was first interviewed she refused to cooperate with the investigation of Mr. Epstein declaring she wanted nothing to d

ly there is nothing in the background of Professor Dershowitz that would make him less credible than their uncorroborated accuser Prince Andrew and the Royal Palace have also unequivocally denied similar allegations of sexual conduct by Prince Andrew. Their denials as well are entitled to weight in your determi

sidering airing, found them to be "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." A filed affidavit in that case from FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater reflects that when Jane Doe 3 was first interviewed she refused to cooperate with the investigation of Mr. Epstein declaring she wanted nothing to d

ly there is nothing in the background of Professor Dershowitz that would make him less credible than their uncorroborated accuser Prince Andrew and the Royal Palace have also unequivocally denied similar allegations of sexual conduct by Prince Andrew. Their denials as well are entitled to weight in your determi

v. United States, 08-CV-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla.), Dkt 324 at 5. In addition, in that very same litigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Timothy R. Slater filed a declaration stating that when Jane Doe 3 was interviewed by the FBI in 2007 she refused to cooperate with the investigation of Mr. Epstein de

ressured into including Professor Dershowitz in her allegations and that she has a financial motive in making these allegations. The Duke of York and the Royal Palace have likewise unequivocally denied Jane Doe's similar allegations against the Duke. Surely, these unequivocal statements of denial of respected membe

v. United States, 08-CV-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla.), Dkt 324 at 5. In addition, in that very same litigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Timothy R. Slater filed a declaration stating that when Jane Doe 3 was interviewed by the FBI in 2007 she refused to cooperate with the investigation of Mr. Epstein de

ressured into including Professor Dershowitz in her allegations and that she has a financial motive in making these allegations. The Duke of York and the Royal Palace have likewise unequivocally denied Jane Doe's similar allegations against the Duke. Surely, these unequivocal statements of denial of respected membe