Epstein Secrets

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

to reviewing such evidence only where the Government conducts a loint investigation" with that agency or branch of government. See United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-.5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) (no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Overs

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

o reviewing such evidence only where the Government conducts a "joint investigation" with that agency or branch of government. See United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at ■4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) (no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversi

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

o reviewing such evidence only where the Government conducts a "joint investigation" with that agency or branch of government. See United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at ■4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) (no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversi

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

o reviewing such evidence only where the Government conducts a "joint investigation" with that agency or branch of government. See United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at ■4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) (no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversi

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

o reviewing such evidence only where the Government conducts a "joint investigation" with that agency or branch of government. See United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) (no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversi