Epstein Secrets

IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020037 EFTA_OOI 67781 EFTA01295878 Page 19 2014 V.I. LEXIS 45, *; 61 V.I. 13, ** expressly define a marital homestead, both the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the Appellate Division of the United States District Court for the Virgin Islands have interpreted § 2305(a), (c) to hold

ithout any contribution from Dr. Wright-Francis and continues to pay those expenses. He also claims that he has made payments on the balance owed to Balbo for construction work on IB-29 Estate Solberg. 12 The mortgage for the Solberg property stipulates that only Mr. Francis signed the promissory note

a person, or by members of his family free of rental charges. Although the Virgin Islands Code does not expressly define a marital homestead, both the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the Appellate Division of the United States District Court for the Virgin Islands have interpreted § (a), (c) to hold th

Balbo Construction which performed construction work for the parties on the marital homestead located at 16-29 Estate Solberg. In the civil action. Balbo alleges that the parties are liable for outstanding payments amounting to Three Hundred Ninety Six Thousand. Five Hundred Forty Four Dollars and Sev

Page 30 2014 V.I. LEXIS 45, *; 61 V.I. 13, ** 'marital homestead,' both the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the Appellate Division of the District Court interpreted Title 33 V.I.C. §§ 2305(a), (c) to hold that a "marital homestea

Thousand Dollars ($725,000.00) subject to a One Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($110,000.00) mortgage. Although the parties dispute the amount owed to Balbo, they acknowledge that ("25] Balbo Construction is owed money for work it has done on the homestead:a 19 See Civil Complaint. Babe v. Jule° Franci