Epstein Secrets

Its=FBI progenitors—the same ones who had investigated Mrs. Clinton =80 deployed at least one informant to probe Trump campaign advisers, obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court wiretap warrant=, issued national security letters to gather records, and unmasked the ide=tities of campaign officials who were surveilled. They al

but boring.. what do you=see as the challegnes what does she or he see.. social On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Kathy Ruemmler wrote: Yawn. And David Rivkin is a ha=k. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court woul= find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous=tree doctrine does

From: Kathy Ruemm ler Sent: 6/23/2018 5:11:45 PM To: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Importance: — High Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does

ction. Its FBI progenitors—the same ones who had investigated Mrs. Clinton—deployed at least one informant to probe Trump campaign advisers, obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court wiretap warrants, issued national security letters to gather records, and unmasked the identities of campaign officials who were surveilled. They als

but boring.. what do you see as the challegnes what does she or he see. social On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Kathy Ruemmler <> wrote: Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does

ction. Its FBI progenitors—the same ones who had investigated Mrs. Clinton—deployed at least one informant to probe Trump campaign advisers, obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court wiretap warrants, issued national security letters to gather records, and unmasked the identities of campaign officials who were surveilled. They al