Epstein Secrets

From: Valeria Chomsky Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 4:10 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Response to your letter - <=div> The latest from the children. Fo

are disturbed, similarly all of this is disturbing to me, extremely so. It's the one serio=sly -- very seriously -- dark spot on the new lives that Valeria and I are shaping for ourselves, and I would therefore like to get it over with and resolved as soon as possible. As I wrote, I cannot understan= wh

and close relations that we always had, and that I'd always treasured. More below, interspersed in your last letter On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Diana Chomsky «mailto: > wrote: Dear Doddoy, We really hesitated to write our long letter to you last month. We only finally decided to write it because you insisted so

atters that are easily settled just by mail. With regard to Max, he and I agreed some time ago that he was in a difficul= position representing both Valeria and me on the one hand, and the rest of the family on the other. There are no difficulties in that, but it's best to resolve the matter cleanly. So

at 4:17 PM Subject: Re: taxes To: Noam Chomsky < Cc: Avi Chomsky < <mailto: Hi, <mailto >=br> =uk <mailto .=k» <mailto /font> <mailto », Valeria Chomsky > > », Harry Chomsky /u> What worries us about continuing to try to clear it all up in writing us that it isn't efficient or effective. There's l

r our own plans. I don't see much point in a m=eting. It seems to me that all of this can be cleared up in writing. On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Diana Chomsky «mailto > wrote: Hi, thanks for your reply. We are very, very concerned that you are not understanding and not getting help in understanding what is happe

From: Valeria Chomsky < Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 5:27 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Fwd: Fwd: taxes - 2 > This is where we stand right=now (e-mails below). They

t, and it's on. Problem is that the house is locked. Tri=d to contact David but haven't yet been able to reach him. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Diana Chomsky «mailto > > wrote: Thanks for your message. I guess it's not productive to continue this c=nversation by this medium at this point. If you have questions a