Epstein Secrets

From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 10:47 PM To: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: Vincent's reply i tried a few time he was always " on the=phone" on Th., Jan 10, 2019 at 11:21 AM Valeria Chomsky > wrote: I would

no reason to accept the false information when we ha=e the documents proving it. And I don=tB93 see why the acknowledgements wouldn't be possible. Valeria <=div> What do you think? Valeria Forwarded message From: Vincent Pisegna Date: Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:30 AM Subject: RE: URGENT To: Val=r

ia Forwarded message From: Vincent Pisegna Date: Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:30 AM Subject: RE: URGENT To: Val=ria Chomsky Cc: Good morning. >, Jason B. Curtin Yesterday, we d=scussed at length the choice you faced. You could settle early on ac=eptable terms but to do so, it required foregoing further inve

From: Valeria Chomsky < Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 4:44 PM To: jeffrey E.; Noam Chomsky Subject: Tax issues Could Richard K. talk to Vinc=nt about the release

is no reason to accept the fal=e information when we have the documents proving it. And I don't see why the acknowledgements wouldn't b= possible. Valeria What do you think? Valeria Forwarded message - <mailto From: Vincent =isegna < => > Date: Thu, Jan 1=, 2019 at 10:30 AM Subject: RE: URGENT

ia Forwarded message - <mailto From: Vincent =isegna < => > Date: Thu, Jan 1=, 2019 at 10:30 AM Subject: RE: URGENT To: Valeria Chomsky < >, Jason B. Curtin < <mailto:JCurtin@kb- law.com» Cc: Noam Chomsky < -gt; Good morning.. Yesterday, we d=scussed at length the choice you faced. You could settle e

no reason to accept =he false information when we have the documents proving it. And I don't see why the acknowledgements wouldn&=39;t be possible. Valeria </=iv> What do you think? Valeria Forwarded messa e From: Vincent Pisegna Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:30 AM Subject: RE: URGENT To: Valeria Chom

From: Valeria Chomsky Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 4:21 PM To: Jeffrey E.; Noam Chomsky Subject: Vincent's reply I would like to write the following: </=iv> V

ded messa e From: Vincent Pisegna Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:30 AM Subject: RE: URGENT To: Valeria Chomsk Cc: Noam Chomsky Good morning. </=pan> Jason B. Curtin Yesterday, we discusse= at length the choice you faced. You could settle early on acceptabl= terms but to do so, it required foregoing further inve

From: J <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 4:41 PM To: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: mediation Yes of course. Anytime On 10/23/18, Valeria Chomsky wrote: > And most important Noam asks if Richard Kahn could be in th

his petition: that the reason why he and Max should > control the marital trust is to protect me from wild over-spending > following my marriage to Valeria. » I went through the details in my earlier letters to you, and to » repeat > the essence, there isn't a particle of truth to it. There were indee

rwarded message > From: Vincent Pisegna <a› > Date: Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:00 PM > Subject: mediation > To: Noam Chomsky > Cc: Valeria Chomsky Jason B. Curtin < > The lawyers believe that Ray Madoff, > https://www.bc.edu/bc-web/schools/law/academics-faculty/faculty-direct > ory=ray-madoff.html, could ser

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 8:51 PM To: Cc: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: Information I bought Avi's house -- also a house for her ex-husban= as part of an ugly divorce. Noam On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 12:57

y <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» =ate: Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 12:44 PM Subject: Fwd: Information To: Vin=ent Pisegna <mailto >, Jason B. Curtin <mailto Cc: Valeria Chom=ky <INIMI=MMIM<mailto Here is some crucial information that we found. Noam 1) Diane's trust as of 2015 2) Gull Haven m