Epstein Secrets

joyed meeting you. I think we agree on a very considerable range of issues. My own view is that Joyce =is in his completeness, a greater writer than Nabokov, and I say this as someone who loves and cherishes Lolita. There is nothing in all of world literature to compare with the Anna Livia Plurabelle se

say this as someone who loves and cherishes Lolita. There is nothing in all of world literature to compare with the Anna Livia Plurabelle section of Finnegan's Wake -- nothing. What Joyce had that Nabokov lacked was the intimacy of his native language. Conrad lacked that intimacy, too, but =he was an comp

joyed meeting you. I think we agree on a very considerable range of issues. My own view is that Joyce =is in his completeness, a greater writer than Nabokov, and I say this as someone who loves and cherishes Lolita. There is nothing in all of world literature to compare with the Anna Livia Plurabelle se

ay this as someone who loves and cherishes Lolita. There is nothing in all of world literature to compare with the Anna Livia Plurabelle section of Finnegan's Wake -- nothing. What Joyce had that Nabokov lacked was the intimacy of his native language. Conrad lacked that intimacy, too, but =he was an comp

joyed meeting you. I think we agree on a very considerable range of issues. My own view is that Joyce =is in his completeness, a greater writer than Nabokov, and I say this as someone who loves and cherishes Lolita. There is nothing in all of world literature to compare with the Anna Livia Plurabelle sec

ay this as someone who loves and cherishes Lolita. There is nothing in all of world literature to compare with the Anna Livia Plurabelle section of Finnegan's Wake -- nothing. What Joyce had that Nabokov lacked was the intimacy of his native language. Conrad lacked that intimacy, too, but =he was an comp