Epstein Secrets

USA Today <https://vvww.usatoday.com/stoty/news/politics/elections/2020/11/15/election-2020-live- updates-trump-admits-biden-won/6302435002/> (11/15, Cummings, 10.31M) reports Giuliani "claimed to possess evidence supporting his claims but declined to share it on air." McEnany: Democrat Secretaries Of Sta

ration/dhs-secretary-unlawful- daca/2020/11/I 5/c52ae64e-26d1-11eb-8672-c281c7a2c96e_story.html> (11/15, Sacchetti, 14.2M) reports US District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis of New York "has ruled that acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf lacked the authority to limit the work permits of hundreds of thousands of

nited States as children because his appointment to the top position in the department did not appear to be lawful." In "an unusual Saturday ruling" Garaufis "said...that the `plain text' of the department's order of succession showed that Wolf's ascension to acting secretary did not follow established la

id he won, but by going on to point out that it was illegal. Obviously, he's contesting it vigorously in the courts." In addition, USA Today (11/15, Cummings, 10.31M) reports Giuliani "claimed to possess evidence supporting his claims but declined to share it on air." McEnany: Democrat Secretaries Of St

rm. Judge Rules Wolf Serving Illegally, Invalidates His Suspension Of DACA. The Washington Post (11/15, Sacchetti, 14.2M) reports US District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis of New York "has ruled that acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf lacked the authority to limit the work permits of hundreds of thousands of

nited States as children because his appointment to the top position in the department did not appear to be lawful." In "an unusual Saturday ruling" Garaufis "said...that the `plain text' of the department's order of succession showed that Wolf's ascension to acting secretary did not follow established l

id he won, but by going on to point out that it was illegal. Obviously, he's contesting it vigorously in the courts." In addition, USA Today (11/15, Cummings, 10.31M) reports Giuliani "claimed to possess evidence supporting his claims but declined to share it on air." McEnany: Democrat Secretaries Of St

rm. Judge Rules Wolf Serving Illegally, Invalidates His Suspension Of DACA. The Washington Post (11/15, Sacchetti, 14.2M) reports US District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis of New York "has ruled that acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf lacked the authority to limit the work permits of hundreds of thousands of

nited States as children because his appointment to the top position in the department did not appear to be lawful." In "an unusual Saturday ruling" Garaufis "said...that the `plain text' of the department's order of succession showed that Wolf's ascension to acting secretary did not follow established l

id he won, but by going on to point out that it was illegal. Obviously, he's contesting it vigorously in the courts." In addition, USA Today (11/15, Cummings, 10.31M) reports Giuliani "claimed to possess evidence supporting his claims but declined to share it on air." McEnany: Democrat Secretaries Of St

rm. Judge Rules Wolf Serving Illegally, Invalidates His Suspension Of DACA. The Washington Post (11/15, Sacchetti, 14.2M) reports US District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis of New York "has ruled that acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf lacked the authority to limit the work permits of hundreds of thousands of

nited States as children because his appointment to the top position in the department did not appear to be lawful." In "an unusual Saturday ruling" Garaufis "said...that the 'plain text' of the department's order of succession showed that Wolf's ascension to acting secretary did not follow established l

4 at 8-9) conclude that the admission of evidence about distinct criminal incidents are not direct evidence of the conspiracy. See United States v. Cummings, 60 F. Supp. 3d 434, 438 (S.D.N.Y. 2014), vacated on other grounds, 858 F.3d 763 (2d Cir. 2017) (evidence of prior narcotics arrest and firearms con

t understand why the Minor Victims continued to 3 In United States v. Raniere, No. 18 Cr. 204 (NGG), 2019 WL 2212639 (E.D.N.Y. May 22, 2019), Judge Garaufis questioned whether an expert on grooming with experience focused on victims may have been able to testify reliably about how "perpetrators often use

18 WL 1411274 (D. Colo. Mar. 21, 2018) 3 United States v. Bums, No. 07 CR 556, 2009 WL 3617448 (N.D. III. Oct. 27, 2009) 20, 21 United States v. Cummings, 60 F. Supp. 3d 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) 26 United States v. Curley, 639 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2011) 26 United States v. Curley, No. SI 08 Cr. 404 (SCR), 2

ng. The government implicitly concedes as much. In a footnote, the government acknowledges the decision in United States v. Raniere, in which Judge Garaufis ordered a Daubert hearing on the government's proposed expert testimony on grooming. 2019 WL 2212639, at *7-8. In that case, however, the government