Epstein Secrets

r. 2003) 8 United States v. Carboni, 204 F.3d 39 (2d Cir. 2000) 6 United States v. Concepcion, 983 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1992) 6 United States v. Cummings, 60 F. Supp. 3d 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) vacated on other grounds 858 F.3d 763 (2d Cir. 2017) 6, 7, 8, 9 United States v. Curley, 639 F.3d 50 (2d Cir

United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR-213 (MKB), 2014 WL 3734522 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2014) 12 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) 7 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 7 Mann Act passim Other Authorities Fed. R. Evid. 401 12 Fed. R. Evid. 402 11, 12 Fed. R. Evid. 403 passim Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) passim Fed. R. Evid

r. 2003) 8 United States v. Carboni, 204 F.3d 39 (2d Cir. 2000) 6 United States v. Concepcion, 983 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1992) 6 United States v. Cummings, 60 F. Supp. 3d 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) vacated on other grounds 858 F.3d 763 (2d Cir. 2017) 6, 7, 8, 9 United States v. Curley, 639 F.3d 50 (2d Cir

United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR-213 (MKB), 2014 WL 3734522 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2014) 12 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) 7 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 7 Mann Act passim Other Authorities Fed. R. Evid. 401 12 Fed. R. Evid. 402 11, 12 Fed. R. Evid. 403 passim Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) passim Fed. R. Evid

18 WL 1411274 (D. Colo. Mar. 21, 2018) 3 United States v. Bums, No. 07 CR 556, 2009 WL 3617448 (N.D. III. Oct. 27, 2009) 20, 21 United States v. Cummings, 60 F. Supp. 3d 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) 26 United States v. Curley, 639 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2011) 26 United States v. Curley, No. SI 08 Cr. 404 (SCR), 2

ein intended to engage in sexual contact with her. See id. It is the government. not the defense, that apparently does not understand the law. The Mann Act conspiracies charged in the S2 Indictment each require proof that Ms. Maxwell acted with the intent that the alleged victim would "engage in sexual

ewise, although our precedent illustrates that the inter-state categories may be adapted for use in specific foreign commerce contexts, see, e.g.. Cummings. 281 F.3d at 1049 n. 1, the categories have never been deemed exclusive or mandatory, nor has the Supreme Court suggested their applica- tion in re

pation in plan for transportation of women to Chicago and Nevada for prostitution pur- poses was sufficient to sustain her convic- tion of violating Mann Act. 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2421 et seq., 2422. 19. Constitutional Law e42.3(l) Male defendant lacked standing to at- tack Mann Act on basis that it violated