Epstein Secrets

t the Newport Folk Festival. Then Jules’ friend, Arthur Kretchmer, became Cavalier’ smanaging editor. “When the editorial director later resigned,” Kretchmer said, “there was a 24-hour hiatus before the new editorial director arrived.” Siegel and Kretchmer had been discussing the possibility of publishing

issue with only the one large red headline on the Caval/iercover: “BEAT ‘EM SENSELESS FIRST” —THE FREE SPEECH CONTROVERSY, BY PAUL KRASSNER... At the University of California in Berkeley on September 1964, Dean Katherine Towle banned posters, easels and tables at the Bancroft-Telegraph Street entrance to the Berkeley campus “because

at the Newport Folk Festival. Then Jules’ friend, Arthur Kretchmer, became Cavalier’s managing editor. “When the editorial director later resigned,” Kretchmer said, “there was a 24-hour hiatus before the new editor arrived.” Siegel and Kretchmer had been discussing the possibility of publishing an issue on

concept of the total education experience on campus which I believe to be the basic significance of the much- misunderstood free-speech imbroglio at the University of California in Berkeley.” The sit-in lasted till 3 a.m. Next day, October 1, 1964, ten tables were manned again, and a campus policeman approached one of the tables (manned

at the Newport Folk Festival. Then Jules’ friend, Arthur Kretchmer, became Cavalier’s managing editor. “When the editorial director later resigned,” Kretchmer said, “there was a 24-hour hiatus before the new editor arrived.” Siegel and Kretchmer had been discussing the possibility of publishing an issue on

concept of the total education experience on campus which I believe to be the basic significance of the much- misunderstood free-speech imbroglio at the University of California in Berkeley.” The sit-in lasted till 3 a.m. Next day, October 1, 1964, ten tables were manned again, and a campus policeman approached one of the tables (manned

at the Newport Folk Festival. Then Jules' friend, Arthur Kretchmer, became Cavalier's managing editor. "When the editorial director later resigned," Kretchmer said, "there was a 24-hour hiatus before the new editor arrived." Siegel and Kretchmer had been discussing the possibility of publishing an issue on

concept of the total education experience on campus which I believe to be the basic significance of the much- misunderstood free-speech imbroglio at the University of California in Berkeley." The sit-in lasted till 3 a.m. Next day, October 1, 1964, ten tables were manned again, and a campus policeman approached one of the tables (manned