Epstein Secrets

ee= against you and Hardman. You indica=ed you wanted the matter resolved now and be done with it. If you wa=t to pay nothing now we can go back to Kranz and make that demand, but the= you would only be released if the short sale closes. Not too =ong ago they turned down your offer to settle for $100,

ement To: Thrsra— C=: "Trent Steele" <II > Date: Monday, October 31= 2011, 5:38 PM Trent aske= me to send you this information on the settlement. Kranz orig=nally said $100,000 plus closing costs to be paid .% by Hardman and by you contingent on the short sale closing. We agreed to pay =60,000 now,

yer, but he has told lies constantly & I don't trust him. 1= the wiser course to just pay the $60,000.00 and be done with it? -=- On Mon, 10/31/11, Leanne Seibert < > wrote: From: Leanne Seibert < =; Subject: Settlement To: Thrsra— C=: "Trent Steele" <II > Date: Monday, October 31= 2011, 5:38 PM Trent ask

ee= against you and Hardman. You indica=ed you wanted the matter resolved now and be done with it. If you wa=t to pay nothing now we can go back to Kranz and make that demand, but the= you would only be released if the short sale closes. Not too =ong ago they turned down your offer to settle for $100,

ment To: "'drsra"' C=: "Trent Steele" < • Date: Monday, October 31= 2011, 5:38 PM Trent aske= me to send you this information on the settlement. Kranz orig=nally said $100,000 plus closing costs to be paid .% by Hardman and by you contingent on the short sale closing. We agreed to pay =60,000 now,

yer, but he has told lies constantly & I don't trust him. 1= the wiser course to just pay the $60,000.00 and be done with it? -=- On Mon, 10/31/11, Leanne Seibert > wrote: ca From: Leanne Seibert . 1.ig=; Subject: Settlement To: "'drsra"' C=: "Trent Steele" < • Date: Monday, October 31= 2011, 5:38 PM Tr

Settlement To: mdrsram Cc: "Trent Steele" Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 5:38 PM Trent asked me to send you this information on the settlement. Kranz originally said $100,000 plus closing costs to be paid '/ by Hardman and'/: by you contingent on the short sale closing. We agreed to pay $60,000 no

yer, but he has told lies constantly & I don't trust him. Is the wiser course to just pay the $60,000.00 and be done with it? - - On Mon, 10/31/11, Leanne Seibert > wrote: From: Leanne Seibert < Subject: Settlement To: mdrsram Cc: "Trent Steele" Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 5:38 PM Trent asked me to

nt from my iPhone On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:38 PM, drsra wrote: I don'k know if I just sent this to you or back to Trent. We tried to get in touch with Kranz for 2 days and this is what we got. Pm thinking it is probably best to pay the $60,000.00 because it is cheaper than leagl fees to win. Your though

hat we got. Pm thinking it is probably best to pay the $60,000.00 because it is cheaper than leagl fees to win. Your thoughts? - - On Wed, 11/2/11, Leanne Seibert wrote: From: Leanne Seibert Subject: FW: National City Bank v. Hardman Development Corp. To: "Trent Steele" , mdrsram Date: Wednesday, November

ved this communication in error, plea=e notify us immediately by reply e-mail. From: Leanne Seibert Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 3:10 =M To: 'Kranz, Michael T.' Cc: Trent Steele Subject: RE: Letter of Intent He doesn't want a settlement depende=t on closing the short sale. He is willing to pay

at. If not, we can keep my offer in the table and if Trent advise=, up the amount gradually. Thanks for staying on top of it. --- On Wed, 10/19/11, Leanne Seibert < From: Leanne Seibert < Subject: F=: Letter of Intent To: —drsram < Date: Wednesday, October 1=, 2011, 3:42 PM FYI - Most recent exchange with

ved this communication in error, plea=e notify us immediately by reply e-mail. From: Leanne Seibert Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 3:10 =M To: 'Kranz, Michael T.' Cc: Trent Steele Subject: RE: Letter of Intent He doesn't want a settlement depende=t on closing the short sale. He is willing to pay

me in that it ain't $1.5 million= --- On Wed, 10/19/11, drsra < <mailto > wrote: From: drsra < <mailto Subject: Re: FW: Letter o= Intent To: "Leanne Seibert" < Date: Wednesday, Octo=er 19, 2011, 5:05 PM > > =>> > I would accept his terms, obviously, but would rather to= as you aptly put it, end this

ement To: "drsra" Cc: "Trent Steele&quo=; Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 5:38 PM Trent asked me to send you this informatio= on the settlement. Kranz originally said $100,000 plus closin= costs to be paid /2 by Hardman and % by you contingent on the short sa=e closing. We agreed to pay $60,000 no

er, but he has told lies constantly & I don't trust him. =Is the wiser course to just pay the $60,000.00 and be done with it? --- On Mon, 10/31/11, Leanne Seibert > =rote: From: Leanne Seibert Subject: S=ttlement To: "drsra" Cc: "Trent Steele&quo=; Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 5:38 PM Trent asked me t

bject: Set To: mdrsram Cc: "Trent Steele" Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 5:38 PM Trent asked me to send you this information on the settlement. Kranz originally said $100,000 plus closing costs to be paid 1/2 by Hardman and 1/2 by you contingent on the short sale closing. We agreed to pay $60,000

yer, but he has told lies constantly & I don't trust him. Is the wiser course to just pay the $60,000.00 and be done with it? --- On Mon, 10/31/11, Leanne Seibert wrote: From: Leanne Seibert Subject: Set To: mdrsram Cc: "Trent Steele" Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 5:38 PM Trent asked me to send you thi